Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
Where the fuck would you even get the concept of flight? This is a stupid discussion. Discuss paranormal things, you cocks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c737/9c737cc9ab16286a2dd828e30c302fb669dbd08f" alt="Lol :lol: :lol:"
Where the fuck would you even get the concept of flight? This is a stupid discussion. Discuss paranormal things, you cocks.
This is not the same thing. Your a hypothesizing a future not hypothesizing the existence of something. If a thousand years ago you said "There exists a machine that can fly" you would've been wrong just as you are wrong about ghosts.No, it does not have to be. That is complete bullshit. If I were born thousands of years ago I could have said "I believe that humans are capable of creating something that will fly" and yet that could NOT have been proven for many MANY years, yet it is NOT unreasonable to believe that.
Dark Matter can be observed indirectly. That is an observable fact. Science discovered Dark Matter so I don't see how you are using it to say scientific reasoning is invalid. Can you name a real example where scientific reason fails?Strictly adhering to scientific reasoning is as silly as beliving any paranormal stuff, I mean you're going on OBSERVABLE facts, which really doesn't always account for the whole of the situation. (Which is why the dark matter thing is mentioned, we can NOT even observe it - we know it is there, but it is completely unobservable.)
Ask yourself why you are contradicting yourself and if that contradiction is rational. If it's not maybe you should reassess your views.I know I'm contradicting myself here with my not believing in god without experiencing it but ... I never claimed to be perfect.
Don't exist.I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on aliens and ufos tbqh.
This will be my last post on the subject in this thread. If you wish to continue this argument via PMs or a Skepticism thread I am willing to do that.
I hate the fact that people always say that "It is impossible because the conditions needed for life are too specific" but I think that we far too narrowly define life - intelligent life too for that matter.
yeah, many bacterium can thrive in the most extreme of conditions. i would think all you need is water.
I know I said it was my last post but I just have to respond to this.That is the one thing that fails you cookie, your all too stubborn adherence to "science."
I'll post more later, maybe PM you - but I'm not all that interested currently in argueing. I'd much rather discuss paranormal stuff.