The Political & Philosophy Thread

I bet if you changed "some college" to "College degree" and then controlled for median wages within degree fields, those gaps would start disappearing.
 
i asked if there was a degree search by race/ethnicity study in the states, similar to women but for blacks, but haven't seen anything yet. in my understanding and experience, blacks seem to get courted towards the humanities like white women

i'm going for Computer Science now and the ethnic demographics of my 300+ person class are hilarious
 
Even gaining a degree doesn't mean that much on its own. The bottom quartile of BA/BS holders have the same income as the average high school grad. You have to actually have a good and valuable degree if you want a job. College is one of the biggest shams right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dak
i asked if there was a degree search by race/ethnicity study in the states, similar to women but for blacks, but haven't seen anything yet. in my understanding and experience, blacks seem to get courted towards the humanities like white women

i'm going for Computer Science now and the ethnic demographics of my 300+ person class are hilarious

that's a good degree. what are the demographics like? I'm guessing: mostly asian, some white, some indian
 
rms said:
White people have too much wealth, we need an inheritance tax so black people can 'catch' up or 'surpass' whitey in wealth

We do. Its called the death tax. Hopefully trump gets it repealed
 
It's funny that, in the UK anyway, some of the loudest opposition to inheritance tax comes from people that really don't need to worry about it. I guess that's because they largely read papers that are owned and edited by people that do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonfloyd
That explains why whites were against slavery, until now I just assumed they did it for the lolz, not expecting slavery to actually end.

Well, first of all, I'm surprised you wouldn't say those white abolitionists were all just virtue-signalling.

It is a false equivalence to equate those railing against oppression that doesn't personally affect them with those railing against a policy which inconveniences the well-to-do, because they believe it does affect them.
 
Well, first of all, I'm surprised you wouldn't say those white abolitionists were all just virtue-signalling.

Only a moron would be surprised at that and I don't consider you a moron, so that's kind of surprising. ;)

It is a false equivalence to equate those railing against oppression that doesn't personally affect them with those railing against a policy which inconveniences the well-to-do, because they believe it does affect them.

It's false to claim that those railing against inheritance tax believe it affects them. What proof do you have that they think that?
 
It's false to claim that those railing against inheritance tax believe it affects them. What proof do you have that they think that?

I'm not saying everyone who opposes it believes it affects them. The wealthy people who oppose it do so because they know it affects them. However, tagradh said that the loudest opposition to it, at least in the UK, comes from people who aren't affected by it. It's his claim, not mine, but you chose to run with it. You brought up the analogy of opposition to slavery, so as to imply that those particular people are opposed to the inheritance tax out of similar humanitarian impulses, which is an absurd comparison to make.
 
No I used that analogy to be as hyperbolic as possible in order to mock his retarded mentality which implied that people only oppose things that directly affect them or that people should only oppose things that directly affect them.

I thought it was pretty clear I was trying to be humorous. H.P. got it.