Okay, here's an interesting situation I want to bring up, for the hell of it.
Someone like George here, when receiving criticism on his writing and opinions, says he can't help it if someone gets bothered by "one person's opinion", such as his own. In a sense, he's right, why should someone care about one person's opinion, and why let it get to you? Ah but here's the thing...
At the same time, you're (i.e. George) putting forth an opinion via a magazine, website, etc., for many people to read, and you are also admitting that your purpose is to potentially "sway" people's opinions towards your own. So in essence, you're not merely just stating that you don't like a band or album or whatever, but you're in a sense actively putting forth your opinions against said bands, albums, etc., in hopes of getting people to follow your lead and dislike or disregard the same things you do.
It is here where I say it becomes personal, and not so easy to disregard as just "one man's opinion". I think it's kind of comical actually when these reviewers put forth such venom-spewing hatred in print, no matter how insulting or belittling they get towards the artist, but then when actually confronted directly on the matter, they cop the whole "hey, its just my opinion, don't let it bother you so much"-thing. You can't have it both ways, if you're going to publicly put forth such strong opinions against someone, in an effort to sway the public's opinions towards yours, then you have to take responsibility for it and realise that you've stepped beyond just humbly being "one man's opinion" anymore.
If Greg here is a staunch enough supporter of Devin Townsend and his art, and feels that the man's music means enough to him personally, then why SHOULDN'T he feel the need to debate with George over his negative diatribe against DT, especially when George is not only voicing his personal opinions, but doing it in a very public way and admitting that he hopes to sway people's opinions as well? I'm rather baffled by the fact that George can't seem to comprehend this fact, actually. If I were to use this forum now as a means to spew hatred and distaste for certain artists, people, etc., and I admitted that I was doing it in hopes of influencing other's to agree with me, could I or should I really be surprised if some people (be it fans or even the artists and people themselves I'm speaking out against) were to come after me to spew their hate or disagreement back at me?
Myself and the other guys in ND have spoken out pretty regularly on here about our distaste for alot of reviewers/writers and their "lazy journalism" and other quirks. Ironically, we've received some feedback from different writers/reviewers, who've taken offense to this and made a point of stating that they in fact work very hard at what they do, take their craft seriously, and put in alot of time and effort to properly listen to promos and read band bios, etc. I respect that, completely. What's funny is that many of the writers/reviewers don't realise that it's merely the tables being turned on them, because while they're so quick to criticise and tear something to shreds that we've recorded, they're not thinking about how WE in fact work very hard at what we do, take our craft seriously, and put in alot of time and effort to do what we've done. All I'm saying is, if you're going to be openly vocal about your opinions and criticisms, then you should be well prepared to expect the same back at you, regardless.
I don't have a problem with the fact that people dislike our music or even hate it. That's fine, everyone is in fact entitled to such opinions and feelings, as am I. But it's the notion that someone can actually in a sense campaign their negative opinions of us in public forums such as magazines and websites, in hopes of getting others to join them in their dislike or hatred against us. I mean what else do I say to that but "Go fuck yourselves"? LOL I personally never believed that any review ought to be meant to "sway" anyone at all, based on what the reviewer's personal tastes are. I want a review to tell me the basics-- who the band is, how long is the record, how many songs, what style of music it is, and maybe even factor in things like the recording/sound quality and hell, even the controversial "comparisons" to other bands can be helpful at times. But I couldn't really give a flying fuck about whether or not George or any other reviewer feels that an album "insults" him as a music fan. I'll make those kinds of decisions for myself if and when I hear the cd in question. I don't need to be swayed by you, thanks. But so many people do allow themselves to be swayed because they think that's how it's supposed to be, and thats what people like Georgie here thrive upon. I wish more people would think for themselves, and at the same time, speak out against these overly opinionated fuckers such as Greg did.
I recently had an interesting back and forth with Jay over at the Royal Carnage forum over a lengthy review he did with us. There were things he said that I didn't completely agree with or things that I wanted to speak my opinion on, and I did. We had an intelligent, reasonable back and forth conversation/debate on it, and at the end of it, not only do I think he understood certain points of mine but I also came to understand some of his points much better as well. I have respect for the guy because even though he stated things that I disagreed with and felt somewhat challenged by as the artist, he stated them in a well spoken and intelligent manner that was thought provoking, not insulting and filled with malice. He also didn't come across as though he was hoping to seriously "sway" anyone away from buying or listening to our cd. If more writers were like that, I'd have a whole new respect for the media. I'm not meaning to be an asskisser towards him by saying all this, just merely presenting an example of someone who in fact gets it "right".
Let me just say that, much like George's claims, I too LIVE for music, and have for as long as I can remember. But I've never felt like it was my need nor my duty to have to sway anyone else's opinions about the music they buy or listen to, in order to match my own. Even when I have heard music that I couldn't stand or tolerate personally, I don't campaign against it. Because I realise that no matter how much you think you've got a clue about what's good and what's not, ultimately the listening experience is a personal one for each one of us, and how you hear things depends on the individual, and shouldn't be based on what I or anyone else has to say about it. Develop your own ear and your own tastes and likes/dislikes based on what moves you, not on what someone at a magazine or a website or in some band tells you is good or not. In my opinion, it's what people like George basically stand against by spewing his bullshit and expecting, or hoping, that people will follow his lead. It is for this that I dislike the guy, not simply because he didn't personally like my album.