hmm that's a big kick in the balls dude.. i mean it's a cool & useful device but 1500 is too much for an "hardware cab sim". Especially if u wanna reamp.. u get a reamp box which is waay cheaper.
So what is the difference between the VB-101 and the Axe FX Ultra (as far as modeling vs. real amp etc.)
From what I understand... the VB-101 "IS" the sound of your amp and tubes etc., NOT a modeling device. The cabs and mic sims are what adds the "tone" so-to-speak to YOUR amp and tubes etc.
Is that correct?
Also, there's another unit coming out from Two Notes that's stereo I hear called the Torpedo VM-202. I've been emailing the company about it and it seems like it has an effect input to run stereo effects of your choice as well.
Here's a splash about it. http://www.gearwire.com/twonotes-vm202.html Jamie
you nailed it :
Axe Fx = mostly a big choice of diverse & very good amp/pedals modelizations + nice effects
+ IRs since without IR's you cannot use it without a poweramp+cab (+mic if you wanna use a recorded signal for studio or live)
Torpedo vb-101 = you have a rig (amp head, pedals, whatever) that you love already, and the torpedo is the silent killer cab/mic/miking/most fx unit (with real time settings adjustements, which is a big difference compared to loading up an IR with predetermined "settings" (cab/mic/miking) that you cannot tweak (cab/mic/miking) afterwise) you add at the end of your chain
And yeah you're right about the VM-202, it's in the works. It's like the Torpedo VB-101, but stereo (means you can use two cab/mic/miking/post fx combinations at the same time); without the loadbox also (means you can use it directly after a preamp, or use with a preamp+poweramp if you add a loadbox)
The VB-101 is a mono unit with the exception of the final post micing processor "spacial" which creates a stereo effect that's particularly useful when using headphones. Analog effects can be used as one would use them with a traditional amp set up ie. either between the guitar and the amp or in the amp's (assuming an effect loop exists) effect loop. In addition, the Torpedo's output may be processed and in this case, stereo effects are easy. You could also create a tri stereo (center dry, left and right) rig in this manner much the same way as Steve Lukather or Eddie Van Halen do with their Bradshaw racks.
So you would STILL need the VB-101 to get YOUR AMPS sound and feel WITH the VM-202 correct? Can the VM-202 be used just like an Axe Fx like... just "plug-n-play"? If so, wouldn't it be similar as the Axe FX (like Two Notes version of the Axe FX?) So to speak?
I was all set to pull the trigger on an Axe FX Ultra but instead, I'm having a custom, TRUE Point-to-Point, hand-wiring amp built for the highest quality and shortest possible signal path, using only the best components. This is a 1of a kind custom amp so I can work with it to get my sound. My ONLY problem is I have a 10X9 room I use as my studio in my home. So HOW the heck am I going to crank the amp with out earplugs? LOL!
It's only going to be 15watts but SILL when I owned a Blues Jr. I never really got it passed 4. So I was thinking "Well... I COULD build a sound proof box... stick it in the bedroom next to my studio (no basement) and mic it and put the head next to me in here." THEN I ran across the Torpedo from one guys suggestion on a thread I started on the Fractal forum. (Here's the thread) http://www.fractalaudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=12947
After re-reading it I told my wife like "WOW!!!! COULD THIS BE REAL???!!!" LOL!
If I WANTED to sound like EVERYONE else, I'd buy the Axe FX and then use the patches and the sounds that EVERY one uses right? But modeling is still modeling and I want MY SOUND ya know? Now... it looks like the VB-101 will do that. THAT's why I'm a bit leery on the VM-202 cause IF it ISN'T a load box, then it seems liked I would need both the VB-101 and the VM 202. I don't mind actually, just means saving up some $$$!
I don't record for a hobby so for me, getting the right gear IS crucial.
Now, do I need 2 amps sims in the VM-202? Not sure, sounds awesome, but my MAIN thing is being able to run Stereo Effects and record them STEREO with the VB-101.
Have you tried that? Recording Stereo Effects? To put a stereo effect in front of a mono amp then run it through the VB-101 wouldn't work. It would have to be inserted somewhere after the VB-101 correct?
When I asked Diffusion Audio this question they said this:
So I guess coming OUT of the VB-101 I would go into something like (let's say) an Eventide Timemachine. THEN... go into my AD converters correct? Now, maybe I could add my effects after I cut the guitar parts by going out of my ADDA.. into the effect unit of my choice... then BACK into my ADDA cright? The only thing is, if I'm playing with a dely box, I'm playing according to what I'm hearing which influences HOW I play!
Perhaps there's a way to hear the effect I'm using... cut the signal dry... then add it after with the VB-101. But it still would be cool just to print it stereo, all in one take and say "That was cool" then move on to the next track (if you know what I mean.)
Jamie
I'm sorry man, no clip of this I've heard has really sounded very good at all; I'd rather use impulses or *gulp* my POD for direct recording.
Jamie since you're asking very specific questions, especially on the stereo effects thing which i don't know well, i sent an email to Guillaume from Two Notes and he might come here to reply to your questions.
Did you checkout some shoutouts like the following ?
I looked through every thread you linked to in the original post, and I can't find any shootout like this. What I did find, were a bunch of clips of tones that shouldn't cost anywhere near what an SE + 1500 costs.
I haven't seen any either. That's why I'm asking for those who have both units (Axe FX and VB-101) to show us their stuff! :danceboy:
Thanks man! I didn't even know they had a forum yet! LOL!
I'll try to hit on it. I hear the problem with load boxes is that they can change the tone and sound you are going for since the speaker is pushing air and vibrating through your cab (which is part of YOUR sound).
However, the sims in the VB-101 and mics might be "as good" (so to speak) according to what people actually hear.
My thing is no matter how good digital modeling has become, there are some people who can tell the difference on the Axe FX as far as more digital distortion vs. real tube amp distortion.
With that being said... is there a big difference (in your opinion Djabthrash) on the distortion that you are getting out of your amp + VB-101 + Daw vs. an Axe Fx (if you own an Axe that is) or whatever digital modeling device you own?
If not you personally... do you know others who have both the Axe FX and the VB-101 and can honestly say "Wow... my real amp with tubes going through the VB-101 sounds better than my Axe FX amp/tubes sims"
Something like that!
Jamie
I looked through every thread you linked to in the original post, and I can't find any shootout like this. What I did find, were a bunch of clips of tones that shouldn't cost anywhere near what an SE + 1500€ costs.