Then find them and give me a good reason to never have to think about relativity again.
I'm dead fucking serious.
Just because it could exist doesn't mean it does or that it should.
What's being requested is proof - without proof you're saying nothing.
Jeff
nice to see that I don't have to get entangled in this
I studied physics myself a couple of years back (university), so I know a bit of the deal...
I always avoid these kind of dicussions cause for a discussion you have to use the same vocabulary/language....
it's not possible in this case, it's like religious discussions, you (we) are for example using the term "proof/evidence" in a very clearly defined manner.
in physics these terms are even more strict than in lets say justice and court, meaning if "there is proof" there is NO FUCKING WAY you can argument against it, if you try it just makes you look like a moron.
that's why duscussing often gives us a headache, we use those terms that way and thus see everyone trying to argue a bit of..hmm...let's say-...whatever.
other ppl use these words differently or seem to confuse these terms with "think so/ heave heard/have been told" so we're basically using completely different vocabulary and a discussion is not possible...
it's always fun when sitting in a pub tho, lol.
but seriusly, I like discussing that shit in the real world (had a nice 3-4 hour conversation with Martin (Sabbat) in Wacken about physics...fun guy with actually something to say).