Misrepresentation - unblack goes against the norm in the tiny subculture of black metal, but it is in reality *the* norm invading one of the few subcultures in opposition to it. The juggernaut of Christianity attacking the tiny black metal movement is poorly described as "going against the grain", more accurately they are repeating the historical actions that have given reason for the creation of black metal in the first place.What's more 'black metal' than subverting the norm, going against the grain or being the lone wolf in a sea followers? In this respect Christian BM seems far more 'tr00' than the myriad of satanic/pagan/occult acts in the genre simply because it inverts the inverted, attempts to deconstruct the norms and destroy the monopoly of meaning within a genre heralded for individualism. Ironically, this in itself seems to adhere quite well to much of the ideological goals of black metal. Whether the music itself is worthy is an entirely different matter, of course.
Read my post here. Comparing unblack metal to Christian songs derived from bar tunes is a false analogy, it would be more accurate if the church choir was drinking, smoking, watching sports and shouting pickup lines at women while singing them.I don't personally think black metal is any better a way then playing thrash, or praise, or rap. I also don't think that it needs to be manipulated at all to express Christian ideology...I really don't think that there is anything inherently wrong with corpse paint, or many other black metal practices...In my opinion, the origin doesn't matter, it's what's being done that counts. An example of this would be how many Christian praise songs are actually derived from bar tunes.
I think your analysis is inaccurate, to say black metal praises generic "opposition and individualism" is simplistic; black metal has always had more specific enemies and specific goals than that. The glorification of historic pagan societies as an ideal alternative seems a more "logical" step than converting to Christianity and commercializing.However, when a band comes along that endeavors to subvert the values of the BM genre itself (the next logical step for such fatalist ideologies) they are treated with utter disdain. Christian BM is just one such movement.
Misrepresentation - unblack goes against the norm in the tiny subculture of black metal, but it is in reality *the* norm invading one of the few subcultures in opposition to it. The juggernaut of Christianity attacking the tiny black metal movement is poorly described as "going against the grain", more accurately they are repeating the historical actions that have given reason for the creation of black metal in the first place.
I think your analysis is inaccurate, to say black metal praises generic "opposition and individualism" is simplistic; black metal has always had more specific enemies and specific goals than that. The glorification of historic pagan societies as an ideal alternative seems a more "logical" step than converting to Christianity and commercializing.
OK... The subculture attacks the dominant culture, the dominant culture then retaliates. And this is supposed to be some kind of clever irony? Is that it?
Again oversimplification. Black metal doesn't attack the mainstream culture because it is the mainstream culture, but because it has specific objections to this particular mainstream culture.The irony here is that by propagating such ideals these bands are essentially promoting collectives that were, at one point, the mainstream culture. This hypocritical ideological juxtaposition is what makes black metal such an easy movement to subvert since it's supposed ideologies are little more than a mishmash of opposing ideals to begin with.
oops, stupid me. I didn't feel like reading all those pages, so I come off as ignorant.Read my post here. Comparing unblack metal to Christian songs derived from bar tunes is a false analogy, it would be more accurate if the church choir was drinking, smoking, watching sports and shouting pickup lines at women while singing them.
oops, stupid me. I didn't feel like reading all those pages, so I come off as ignorant.
I think what you said in that thread is actually really good. And now that I think about it, I believe I agree with you. Not enough "christian black metal" bands address why they wear the corpse paint, and generally look no different than the satanic black metal bands.
This post confuses me slightly. Could you clarify?to be classified as black metal
Where to start with Antestor?