the human mind is scientifically weak for patterns and rules... it´s in everything, that´s why it´s a FACT for people on this forum that music isn´t subjektive. I will try not to sound narrow with this, but i cannot really understand where people get that the beatles albums are the best, either revolver or sgt. pepper, it´s like straight taken from a history bible of the new music... i can understand when my father loves the beatles albums, beach boys, bob dylan, stones and the who and other classics for nostalgic reasons...but if you´re going to seem like you know anything about music there´s not even a question of not having The Beatles as your favourite, it does´nt even matter wich album either revolver or sgt. pepper.... a beatles album has to be your favourite. and believe me, i know everything there is to know of the beatles history, i have played every song on revolver and sgt.pepper live several times since i was on a new music school (new=everything after beatles) to tell that i don´t see them as nearly the greatest artists ever... everything is based on reguilar chords and fairly okay melodies...if beatles would have been born around the 90´s they would have instantly been forgotten if even ever recognized... yes they were very experimentive and created what we call "new music"...but the elements of their music has evolved very very much by other artists since them... i realize that music is subjective, but there are too many examples of beatles being one of the most overrated bands ever, and there are too many examples of them being status of your musical history knowledge to have it as defence.... they may have been very creative and should get recognition for that fact...but calling them the best band ever is very exaggerated.
