Vegard Pompey
ALLY TO GOOD, NIGHTMARE TO YOU
Amon Amarth, faggot.
Well yeah, but they don't really count since they just released the same album 7 times under different names.
Amon Amarth, faggot.
They are developing their sound and your taste stands still at the same old self.
Aside from obvious reasons like lack of inspiration, ideas etc...
I think a large part of this has to do with the fact that fans do not share the same point of view as the band. When a band is in it's early stages, people will naturally develop their perception of what the band is and should be/sound like. But often a band's early releases do not represent what the band is actually striving for...hence why bands will often say that their new album is their best one, while the fans will vehemently disagree. Bands over time will become better and more competent at playing their instruments so they put more value in their improvement as a musician as opposed to the other factors that fans may look for.
Bands also evolve and experiment with new things that are not always welcomed by fans, though I generally prefer this route. Conversely, bands sometimes strip away experimentation and go for a more direct and "refined" sound, which I don't really like. I lose interest in bands if they become stale and predictable.
Again, this is just my opinion but I think an album's production can also play a small part. The production on each new album will generally "improve" - by this I mean cleaner, louder production that people accept and associate with being "good" and "well produced". However, I think the modern techniques of producing albums can affect the music negatively, giving the album a more generic and sterile sound that makes the music tiring to listen to. I don't really like loud albums and I certainly don't like it when every hit of the drums sounds the same, like a series of repetitive clicks on a typewriter. I'm not saying this makes or breaks an album for me but to an extent it plays a part. I often find that a band's older albums/style has a certain charm to it that is partially due to the way the album was produced.
Soilwork are still a great band imo
as far as Devin Townsend ive enjoyed all his albums except Synchestra(only good song is Triumph w/ Steve Vai) he's an amazing artist. Even Addicted has quite a few good songs imo.
First Opeth. God damn, Watershed is a terrible, terrible album. Well, to be accurate, Deliverance already marked the beginning of their decline, I think.
I too am disappointed in the direction Opeth is taking. They used to be my favorite band. But, times change and I stll greatly enjoy the "middle-period" albums, so I'm content with that.
Unfortunately i have gave the album enough listens, i can't see how you prefer it to Ocean Machine, Terria or Accelerated Evolution which are all masterpieces imo.You haven't given Synchestra enough listens then. I prefer it to Terria or Physicist. Vampolka/Vampira is enough to make it a great album.
Opeth is all rather samey. They are the Deathspell Omega of fake prog metal. But BWP is sometimes pretty good for nostalgic reasons.
2Pac would never be a part of this pussypop rap that is going on today, he was all real with meaningful lyrics and dark beats.
But all rappers have they're more light shit that makes me sick.
2Pac would never be a part of this pussypop rap that is going on today, he was all real with meaningful lyrics and dark beats. But all rappers have they're more light shit that makes me sick.
It's not that that bothers me, but the pacing. Pacing is very important to me, and their compositions are way too drawn out.If Opeth is samey I'll like to know what band's aren't samey. You can excuse them of being too repetitive at times (they are no more repetitive than most black metal bands) but there's no way Opeth doesn't change their sound significantly from album to album.