@Blowtus: I am against heavy-handed regulation of food on account that the civil remedies available against reckless companies are sufficient to allow for self-regulation. Last I checked, people were not dying like fleas before 1906. Thus, the free market would ensure that harmful foods are not put on the market, and when they do, the manufacturer will risk bankruptcy. Likewise if they mis-label.
Sure, maybe you wouldn't die, but you would hardly have any assurance of quality. You might have a finely trained palette, I wouldn't have a fucking clue whether I'm eating something semi decent or semi rubbish... I like paying a small amount extra on all my food for some regulation of it. I don't feel like my freedom is limited in the slightest.