A question about NSBM

Manic Ferocity

Active Member
Nov 5, 2006
5,280
559
113
Now I'm the type of person who is able to ignore lyrics I don't agree with if the music is of decent quality. I would say NSBM would be the best example of this and being that lyrics DO contribute to the overall musical experience, is it superficial to completely disregard lyrical themes in favor of the music alone? I suppose at least respecting how the message influences the musical creativity (even if the message is unrelatable) is an acceptable way of looking at it but the idea still seems a bit sketchy to me. What are your thoughts?
 
I wish I could just dig up a post I've made on a similar topic before, but I wouldn't know where to look.

I view music as a product of an artist's mind. I judge the work from an 'objective' (used casually) standpoint, distancing my own personal biases from my opinion on the ideological components that drive the music. Whether or not I agree with what the artist is saying is irrelevant. What matters to me is how the artist conveys his message, whether it's done effectively, tastefully, and purposefully, etc.

I've said this much better and more articulately in the past, but I'm too lazy to attempt to do so right now.
 
^ Arghoslent thread on RC :loco: good point and with what you said I gotta agree with it and changed my mind on racism in music/art
 
I personally don't like when music is driven by a political ideology and I refuse to listen to openly nazi bands. When a band has swastika on a coverart, I ignore them.

EDIT: And racism and nazism are two terms.
 
ignoring lyrics when they're an absolutely crucial element of the band (say, dylan or cohen or something) is more 'superficial' than ignoring the lyrics on a black metal album by my reckoning, but regardless i personally like every element of an album to reach me, and then i like seeing how the overall impression sits with me. i don't see the point in ignoring anything, but i guess i've never listened to an album and thought 'holy shit this is amazing but the lyrics alone really spoil it'. i find annoying lyrics tend to accompany annoying music.

as an aside, i do think i'm affected more significantly by things like lyrics, cover art and band name than i really notice, it would be interesting to somehow analyse that.
 
Aesthetic evaluation is very personal in a number of ways. There's nothing "superficial" about finding lyrics, guitar tone, cover art, or whatever to be a deal-breaker when it comes to music, assuming you consider it to be "art." If you're looking for "entertainment..." well, obviously, if you're annoyed by some element of an experience that you're doing purely for fun, there's nothing wrong with dropping it.
 
I don't mind lyrics about nazism, they have their reasons for their beliefs. It's like i don't mind if a band writes anti-Christian lyrics.
 
I'm pretty sure that I listen to music made by Christians with religious themes. I just don't listen to crappy Christian modern rock artists, because I don't feel that style of music expertly conveys anything other than lack of musical ability.
 
I don't mind lyrics about nazism, they have their reasons for their beliefs. It's like i don't mind if a band writes anti-Christian lyrics.

lol. But when someone says "lol fuck jesus" on this board you go apeshit? Funny times.

I don't care if I disagree with the lyrics or not. I often take a similar stance to Nec on these kinds of things; judge music as objectively as possible without clear personal bias with regards to themes or things I may or may not disagree with. Keeping an open mind is essential.
 
I wish I could just dig up a post I've made on a similar topic before, but I wouldn't know where to look.

I view music as a product of an artist's mind. I judge the work from an 'objective' (used casually) standpoint, distancing my own personal biases from my opinion on the ideological components that drive the music. Whether or not I agree with what the artist is saying is irrelevant. What matters to me is how the artist conveys his message, whether it's done effectively, tastefully, and purposefully, etc.

I've said this much better and more articulately in the past, but I'm too lazy to attempt to do so right now.

This exactly my approach to it. For me, the quest is art, and how it has been expressed, not necessarily what (dependent on context) has been expressed.
 
I don't normally make a distinction between what I like musically (or in other words, what I think "sounds good") and what I like about what a piece of music signifies. One reason is that whether or not I think some piece of music sounds good is informed to a great degree by what I take the piece to signify in an extra-musical sense.

I don't admire mere form in music (and art in general). Though music has no propositional content, that does not imply that it's meaningless. I'd say music is heavily imbued with meaning. I'm not quite sure how else one would explain the possibility of irony in music, for instance. So what a piece of music is expressing is rather important to me, simply because it's value-relevant and I don't see any non-ad hoc reason for not taking it into account in my evaluation. Now, if music does in fact evoke or signify anything extra-musical those things are going to be so abstract such as to allow you to be justified in appreciating this dimension of music while ignoring the boneheaded lyrics (especially in extreme metal, where lyrics usually don't even factor into the actual experience of the music).

Regarding NSBM, I would say that boring, uninspired, and uninteresting lyrics usually appear right alongside boring, uninspired, uninteresting music. I find most of this NSBM stuff to be boring and uninspired in the same way I find most politically-charged punk music to be boring and uninspired. I do not really have any moral objections to appreciating NSBM. I just think most of it is stupid.
 
I don't normally make a distinction between what I like musically (or in other words, what I think "sounds good") and what I like about what a piece of music signifies. One reason is that whether or not I think some piece of music sounds good is informed to a great degree by what I take the piece to signify in an extra-musical sense.

I don't admire mere form in music (and art in general). Though music has no propositional content, that does not imply that it's meaningless. I'd say music is heavily imbued with meaning. I'm not quite sure how else one would explain the possibility of irony in music, for instance. So what a piece of music is expressing is rather important to me, simply because it's value-relevant and I don't see any non-ad hoc reason for not taking it into account in my evaluation. Now, if music does in fact evoke or signify anything extra-musical those things are going to be so abstract such as to allow you to be justified in appreciating this dimension of music while ignoring the boneheaded lyrics (especially in extreme metal, where lyrics usually don't even factor into the actual experience of the music).

Regarding NSBM, I would say that boring, uninspired, and uninteresting lyrics usually appear right alongside boring, uninspired, uninteresting music. I find most of this NSBM stuff to be boring and uninspired in the same way I find most politically-charged punk music to be boring and uninspired. I do not really have any moral objections to appreciating NSBM. I just think most of it is stupid.

nice post

yeah i'm not sure i do think the same way as dodens and the rest. i definitely used to, but these days i just don't really care whether my favourite albums have artistic value. i'm perfectly comfortable, even happy with the idea that all judgments of taste are entirely subjective. i know for a fact that all the albums i love reflect my general attitude, tastes and 'biases' to a huge extent, that's entirely why i love them. furthermore i'm not sure whether terms like 'tastefully' or 'effectively' as used by dodens can ever be separated from personal tastes - there are cultural norms in place for them which give us the illusion of something higher than opinion but really i think a questioning (and at times outright rejection) of cultural norms is part and parcel of loving metal.

as for the topic at hand specifically, i don't listen to much NSBM at all because most of it sounds shit to me, no doubt because the great majority of national socialists are drugged up thuggish idiots. i actually don't have many cases where i love how a piece of music sounds but hate the lyrics, because usually bands who write stupid lyrics write stupid music, i think i said that before and it's obvious really. but in those few cases where the music does sound good and the lyrics are obnoxious political bullshit, for example, then this is where keeping an open mind comes in for me. rather than just immediately ignoring the lyrics i'll try to reinterpret them through the lens of my experiences listening to the album. if i keep failing to resolve the conceptual divide (maybe the lyrics reveal themselves as deeper than first thought, maybe the music reveals itself as being similarly obnoxious, whatever) then i'll assume there's no unity to be found, and then i might try ignoring them, but i don't tend to give up easily. obviously it depends on how much i like the music, and how prominent the lyrics are within that music. if i really liked how bob dylan sounded (i don't, by the by) but i hated his lyrics then i'd have to be pretty fucking crazy i think. with some albums, many albums with clean vocals actually, the lyrics are too deeply integrated into the music and aren't extractable in the same way.

my point put another way, i support the notion of 'keeping an open mind' but i don't believe that requires putting aside my own values, preferences, perspectives, but rather by giving an album every chance to appeal to my ways of thinking, even develop them (which the best albums do, i think). my favourite albums are often ones i have a strong negative reaction to upon first listen, but i try to look at them in every way possible, lyrics included. what i don't do is try to think of them purely in terms of how well they achieve what they set out to achieve - i very much analyse albums in relation to myself, as in i analyse my personal experiences listening to them, not in relation to some 'objective' measure of quality i don't know or care about.

i suppose my question to you guys is: if you had a completely unchristian mindset, and a piece of music is uber-tastefully, uber-effectively christian (i don't just mean lyrically, everything about the music reflects christian views to a tee), would it become one of your favourite albums? i'm pretty certain it wouldn't for me, whereas i think if i approached music like dodens then it probably would.

i hope somebody reads this muddled rambling its like my longest post in a year
 
Cythraul's post does not contradict mine, and I agree with his post, so obviously what I said was not clear or misunderstood.
 
Just because he said it was a nice post doesn't necessitate agreement with the ideas it puts forth (not really sure if Tom agrees or not), mainly the idea that all music can be judged, as art, by an "objective" standard (however casual it may be in this case) if properly and open-mindedly experienced.