are any guys of opeth satanists?

[Kenneth R.]

i'm not. i'm employing reason to investigate the meaning of these words that people often take for granted. i seem to have pissed you off. consult a question mark before you start sounding like a robot again.

 

[umdebaba]

i'm not. i'm employing reason to investigate the meaning of these words that people often take for granted. i seem to have pissed you off. consult a question mark before you start sounding like a robot again.

You seem to making your own definitions on what you think, that is not investigating. People know the definitions to these words, stop pretending they don't. Reason is not the process of making up your own shit and trying to pass it off as indisputable knowledge.

 

[Kenneth R.]

i didn't say it was indisputable. these are definitions i have come to thus far through investigating the topic. i don't see you doing anything but hitting google and copy+paste. if you're going to dispute my claim that a "fact" is an opinion shared by a person or group whom people trust to seek truth, then at least don't do it half-assed.

 

[umdebaba]

I did not make up the English language so it is not my right to argue what the definition of a word is, that is the job of a dictionary. A fact is not an opinion because if it was then they wouldn't call it a fact genius. Stop being stupid and use a dictionary, that is what it's for.

 

[dorian gray]

So Christians still do good because they give money right?

who said this exactly? youre apparently not reading the posts. either was cythraul but he was honest enough to say he wasnt.

 

[dorian gray]

I did not make up the English language so it is not my right to argue what the definition of a word is, that is the job of a dictionary. A fact is not an opinion because if it was then they wouldn't call it a fact genius. Stop being stupid and use a dictionary, that is what it's for.

yes, it is your right to argue. do you think all those words just arose out of nowhere all at once and then someone wrote them down? your argument regarding omnipotence was great, this one is terrible. it makes me think you are just lifting things straight out of books.

 

[umdebaba]

Let's face it, Christians do alot of good shit in the world. No offense, but most of you athiests don't do shit. How much money did you give away to charities this past year? None? Sounds about right. So, it's not really appropriate to bash on people like Kenneth who believe.

Don't remember your own posts eh?

 

[dorian gray]

[size=-1]fact - a concept whose truth can be proved; "scientific hypotheses are not facts" [/size]

you defined fact with two more words that need defining. what exactly is a "truth" and what does it mean to be "proved"?

 

[Kenneth R.]

I did not make up the English language so it is not my right to argue what the definition of a word is, that is the job of a dictionary. A fact is not an opinion because if it was then they wouldn't call it a fact genius. Stop being stupid and use a dictionary, that is what it's for.

i agree with dorian on this.

who WROTE a dictionary hmm?? you think Webster was faultless?

i never said facts and opinions are identical things. they are seperate words because, as i stated, a fact IS an opinion. not all opinions are fact.

 

[umdebaba]

yes, it is your right to argue. do you think all those words just arose out of nowhere all at once and then someone wrote them down? your argument regarding omnipotence was great, this one is terrible. it makes me think you are just lifting things straight out of books.

Words were created by humans. Humans defined these words overtime. Their meanings were written down in handy things called dictionaries. Why are we disputing something as silly as definitions seriously. If you want to be stubborn (I'm not calling you stubborn) about it then ok dictionaries might contain error. Some words are open to interpretation. This is why you consult multiple dictionaries. But these words are not vague in their definitions and neither are they complex to understand. Why insist on making these words so hard?

 

[dorian gray]

Don't remember your own posts eh?

if you wouldve read on, you wouldve seen that i was speaking directly to those who were arguing against me. i named them. i also challengd them to discuss how much they gave away to charities in the last year. not one took me up on the challenge. i wasnt speaking to athiests as a whole. you know this.

 

[umdebaba]

i agree with dorian on this.

who WROTE a dictionary hmm?? you think Webster was faultless?

i never said facts and opinions are identical things. they are seperate words because, as i stated, a fact IS an opinion. not all opinions are fact.

Where is your basis for this? Nowhere. A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square. Only difference is that what I said can be proven. You have no basis calling a fact an opinion. You are digging yourself into a hole here.

 

[umdebaba]

if you wouldve read on, you wouldve seen that i was speaking directly to those who were arguing against me. i named them. i also challengd them to discuss how much they gave away to charities in the last year. not one took me up on the challenge. i wasnt speaking to athiests as a whole. you know this.

Excuse me for not reading thoroughly.

 

[dorian gray]

not a problem. please define "proof" though.

 

[deliverance]

alex, i'll take stfu for 1000 please. (not you jon, heh)

 

[Kenneth R.]

Where is your basis for this? Nowhere. A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square. Only difference is that what I said can be proven. You have no basis calling a fact an opinion. You are digging yourself into a hole here.

actually, no i am not.

where do you think "facts" come from? and do you believe they are identical to "truth"?

i have very good basis for calling facts a subset of opinions.

 

[umdebaba]

proof - demonstration that validates a statement as true

 

[dorian gray]

<crimson> has arrived and brought his stench of death with him...

 

[Kenneth R.]

so, if i demonstrate pulling a rabbit out of a hat where previously there was none, that would "prove" it "true" that such a thing is possible?

 

[umdebaba]

actually, no i am not.

where do you think "facts" come from? and do you believe they are identical to "truth"?

i have very good basis for calling facts a subset of opinions.

And your basis is what?