Controversial opinions on metal

Reign In Blood is very important to Death Metal so it's not really 100% completely wrong, but not right.

Hell Awaits is just as important, as are a lot of their other early stuff.

But lo fucking l at saying its not completely wrong to say Reign in Blood is death metal. Way to go! :lol:

Again, them being very important/influential to other sub genres does not mean they played that type of music. Reign in Blood is 100% thrash metal, so yes it would be completely wrong to say that album is death metal.
 
I have No Exit on cassette. It's good if you can just take them as a different band without Arch. It doesn't come anywhere close to the first three albums, needless to say.
 
It's a great four song EP with 20 minutes of assorted song components thrown together in the second half. Their worst album from 1985 to 2000. The highlights put it above Night on Brocken, though.
 
Yeah, my version has it split into eight or whatever parts as well. The first half almost works, but there's a couple too many acoustic/piano cut-aways by the second half, and some of the thrash riffing is sorta generic for them.
 
I only listen to albums from start to finish, which is probably why that album doesn't work for me.
 
I don't mind hearing a track or two, but I won't ever listen to an album to hear a few songs and I don't use the skip function.
 
Pretty much. They're basically post-tech-thrash, some Watchtower-y influences but simplified and less aggressive, with power metal influences creeping in.