My vinyl collection exploded when I got a record player. I had maybe 6-10 records before that point and I'm closing in on 60. Mainly it's bands where I have all their stuff on CD already and now I'm just being a completist.
When you say it's weird that people don't skip "boring" songs, it makes you look like you have ADD.
I demand an example of my "all over the shop" track ratings, I don't know what you're talking about and I've never been called out on that before so I'm really turned on right now to see what this is about.
Are you referring to the first half of With Fear... generally being considered better and more elaborate compared to the second half? What do you skip from that album? I'll admit that I go from 100% attention with Primal Breath to maybe 70% attention by the end of the album, but there's nothing remotely skipworthy on it afaik.
say i'm listening to an album i generally really like for the 20th time and i'm certain that i don't like a particular song and it sucks me out of the album's atmosphere, do you really think i shouldn't skip it because of the sanctity of the album experience or because it'd be an ADD thing to do or something? i'm not being facetious, i really don't get where you're coming from. or are you just denying that such albums exist, because i find that position p strange too
SHOW NO MERCY would be one we talked about recently iirc? i'm looking at your first page of track ratings and there are examples where you've rated some tracks 4 and others 1.5 or 3.5 and 1 etc on the same album, i assume there are probably more extreme examples given this is one page out of 50 but maybe not idk. i'm not criticising this btw, i actually take your track ratings more seriously than most because you don't just blindly like every song on every album you like (or vice versa). and i mean, i can't speak for your scale but if i've rated a song 2 or below it's probably skippable to me, or certainly 1.5 and below. i'm not saying i'd skip it every time 'cause i'm not that trigger happy on the skip button, but skipping something you're not getting anything out of is a common sense option to me. and again, there are tons of 1.5- level songs out there, probability dictates that some of them are gonna be on albums which contain 4+ material.
actually to be honest i often switch it off after 'primal breath' and pretend it's an EP. does that count? it's not even so much an issue of quality dropping (it does, but it's all still listenable) so much as the whole tone and mood changing in a jarring way that saps away the vibe the first half gave me. it's like two different albums wedged together.
Definitely controversial to some here:
Stoner Doom > Trad Doom
Tech/Prog Thrash > Thrash/Death > Crossover > Black/Thrash
OSDM > Tech Death > Brutal Death
Prog Metal > Traditional Heavy Metal
Definitely controversial to some here:
Stoner Doom > Trad Doom
Tech/Prog Thrash > Thrash/Death > Crossover > Black/Thrash
OSDM > Tech Death > Brutal Death
Prog Metal > Traditional Heavy Metal
lol what the fuck is baby metal?
The new symphony x is actually pretty good, aside from a couple cheesy moments. 8/10. Controversial?
Baby Metal:
Only casual Metal fans that are predominately anime dorks like that shit, an extension of yellow fever.