Cymbals are percussion instruments because you strike them and they make a sound. That is what percussion is.
@Baroque
I think in some cases no vocals at all are appropriate in certain music. I think it's often the case that in progressive or technical death metal, it would sound way better if they just removed the vocals all together. So no, I don't dislike instrumental metal for lacking melodic vocals. I dislike music that includes harsh vocals when they don't sound right being there.
I think the tone of harsh vocals drowns out the melodies underneath it, and that's how it detracts from the music.
@Omni
I'll once again bring up the cymbal example. Cymbals are percussion instruments because of the fact that they have no discernible melody. They can vary in pitch, but the tone is so overly harsh and distorted that no true melodic note is made when they are struck. The same is true for harsh vocals.
The reason I dislike this type of overly distorted voice, is because for me the role of the singer and the very definition of "singing" is to produce melody, and I enjoy hearing various vocal melodies on top of the instruments. I just don't understand the point of a vocalist completely eliminating his singing voice from the band.
You don't strike a keyboard when you play it. Marimba and xylophone are percussion instruments. They are classified in that instrument family. They are not part of the same group as keyboards and pianos.
If the music is mixed properly, nothing should drown anything out.I think the tone of harsh vocals drowns out the melodies underneath it, and that's how it detracts from the music.
That's why vocalists who use harsh vocals exclusively are referred to as vocalists and not singers.The reason I dislike this type of overly distorted voice, is because for me the role of the singer and the very definition of "singing" is to produce melody, and I enjoy hearing various vocal melodies on top of the instruments. I just don't understand the point of a vocalist completely eliminating his singing voice from the band.
It still isn't part of the percussion family of instruments and produces an entirely different sound used for different purposes.
Nobody in the know classifies the marimba or xylophone in the same group of instruments as the piano. Anyone with any musical background knows that they are percussion instruments.
"High and mighty". Lol, im guessing its omni that you're responding to![]()
Show me a credible source that lists the piano in the percussion family of instruments.
That isn't a musical text that classifies the piano as part of the percussion section. You won't find one because it's solely down to a technical function inside of the instrument. It has never been, and will continue to never be, a percussion family instrument.
1) Rather than harsh vocals "drowning out the melodies" think of them as "contrasting with the melodies". It adds to the layers of musical expression. Beautiful melodies contrasted against harsh screaming can be very cool.
2) You like the sound of cymbals which are sort of a "distorted percussion" and you like clean percussion. I'm going to take a wild guess and say you like both distorted guitars and clean guitars. So why do you have a double standard for vocals? Why can't you like both distorted and clean vocals?
Yes, I like quite a bit of death and black metal on the instrumental side, especially melodic and progressive DM.my question is do you actually like the kinds of music that, in the opinion of myself and probably a lot of people on this board, best suits extreme vocals? like, do you enjoy, say, darkthrone or immolation or autopsy musically? or are we talking about opeth and co. here