Controversial opinions on metal

I assume it's the latter, honestly it's not so controversial.

I wouldn't think it would be at least not outside metal circles. David Bowie had a very impressive run from Space Oddity to Lets Dance with mostly masterpieces and great albums and a few average at worst albums. I'd say at their best Bowie and Sabbath are equal but Bowie wins purely on having more great albums to offer and being more diverse even though he might not be as influential in his own genre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
They took me some getting used to probably because they reminded me a lot of the 90s grunge and alt rock I didn't care for but after a while they really grew on me.

Yeah, I've been trying to branch backwards from grunge into 80's alt rock and post hardcore stuff. Tends to be pretty hit or miss whether I like a band or not, but some definitely take a few listens to grow on you.
 
Soundgarden_20681.jpg


Vs

Motley-Crue.jpg


I know, it's the sound that counts.

But still, I know which one I think is more metal.
 
Except for maybe some Melvins-y stuff on the first album, Nirvana is not remotely metal. Has nothing to do with heaviness or anything, but rather that they were simply derived from punk music. Even the poppiest hair metal bands have more in common with metal than Nirvana does.
 
Yeah Nirvana and Pearl Jam represent the less metal influenced side of Grunge, although Bleach does have some cool riffs on it. Skin Yard and Gruntruck are probably the most obviously metal bands of the scene, but their songwriting is a little repetitive.

Tad is pretty badass:

 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG