MrTagoMago
Member
- Jul 8, 2016
- 829
- 163
- 43
- 33
This isn't metal it's hardcore punk or proto-grindcore but I'd say it's certainly more vicious and aggressive than Reign in blood.
Sounds like Funeral Doom if someone deleted all the guitar tracks.
It gets more nasty after a while but I think there is something to be said when this bands music was such that it forced fans to vomit and run out during concerts.
Lol pussies. But yeah, I've been meaning to give Swans a proper look in for a while; I've read a few Napalm Death interviews where they state how big an influence they are. And you can definitely hear the similarity between that^ and something like Godflesh.
From the sound of it it will probably take me a few listens to get accustomed to it though, if at all.
this thread is purgatory.
I have this theory that people always like the music that was released around the time they were born the best. Almost all my favourite albums were released either a few years before or after the year I was born. It probably helps that 1991 was a badass year for metal, though - and grunge.
Alice in Chains, Nirvana and Soundgarden are infinitely more metal than most of the garbage pop rock bands that you guys have been name dropping for the past few pages. That cant even be argued.
Nah, 1988 can go fuck itself for the most part.
You've got Leprosy and "Them". Can't be such a bad year.
1987 was the weakest year of the second half of the 80s by a pretty good margin imo.