EternalMetal
Active Member
- Mar 31, 2004
- 1,843
- 670
- 113
Dw, I don't disagree with this. It's just that I can see what he means when he says there's something mechanical in metal riffing that wasn't there in Sabbath or Hard Rock - which I think reflects the side of metal that isn't just heavy blues. That mechanical aspect tends to be what I enjoy about metal the most, incidentally.
It's pretty much the distinguishing feature that separates what we now think of as doom metal from heavy metal, which is why I guess there is any controversy at all. Sabbath would be considered doom metal if it were released today, but still metal.
You keep bringing up Napalm Death though.
I bring Napalm Death up as because to me that was the start of another change in `heavy metal` and to someone whom is a rock guitarist it is the biggest pile of shit I have ever seen and heard in ANY genre of music. It is an example of differences in metal that I was getting across.
So basically you ask us if we like Napalm Death as a litmus test to discredit our opinions. Who is the one with the giant ego now? You dont know shit about metal.