Controversial opinions on metal

nah man I wouldn't say quiet riot is glam. they weren't that good and had like 1 good song. but glam? i thought they dressed more like judas priest or something

radio friendly =/= glam
 
Last edited:
Quiet Riot's existence is weird. Their famous song isn't even theirs and it doesn't even fit on the album but it's crammed directly in the middle.

It doesn't even really sound different from the original.

I don't really consider them glam for whatever that's worth. Hard rock with a goofy image I guess.
 
Quiet Riot's existence is weird. Their famous song isn't even theirs and it doesn't even fit on the album but it's crammed directly in the middle.

It doesn't even really sound different from the original.

Oh hmm I was talking about Metal Health, but never knew cum on feel the noize was a cover song.
 
radio friendly =/= glam

of course it doesn't. I'm just bringing up bands that have know t cause controversy over being labeled glam or not.

As far as quiet riot goes i remember their sound being borderline glammy pop rock/hard rock. When you look up hair "metal" their name pops up in most articles, their albums are on a bunch of glam lists, etc.

but never knew cum on feel the noize was a cover song.

really? One of the few things i actually know about the band.
 
l have a few (several?) glam albums and l admit l like them all. From Japan's Loudness to Scandinavia's (Swedes?) Shotgun Messiah. the main criteria for me tho is the geetar..a good riff is a good riff but it's all about context and glam or DM, like l said, a good riff is a good riff