Controversial opinions on metal

[The Batlord]

Do people listen to more than their first two albums?!

 

[Talos of Atmora]

Do people listen to more than their first two albums?!

Yeah, like that masterpiece "Revolutions Per Minute".

 

[The Batlord]

Yeah, like that masterpiece "Revolutions Per Minute".

Suck shit, shit bitch!

 

[CiG]

The Priest cover is one of my favorite Slayer songs ever. It feels like a great mix of 70's and 80's metal.

Jesus Christ really?

 

[The Batlord]

It wouldn't be as notable if it weren't a cover, but it's still a lot of fun. It also helps that it was one of the first songs I ever heard from Slayer.

 

[Phylactery]

Slayer's cover isn't bad, but it comes nowhere near the mastery of the original.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

It's total garbage and the most offensive thing Slayer has ever done. It's not even heavier than the original.

 

[CiG]

Blame the limp-wristed production on South of Heaven for that.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

It's not really the production. The vocals are weak and pathetic, Lombardo isn't shit compared to Simon Phillips, the thrashy riffs don't come across as any more intense while the bluesy riffs sound disgusting with their tuning and guitar tone, and Downing is still the master of whammy-bar abuse. They point out one of their most obvious influences but then fail to show them respect or desire to surpass them. Easily as pathetic as any of Metallica's worst covers in the 90s, total embarrassment to the band. I'd rather listen to Scrum on repeat for an hour than that cover ever again. If you like it more than the original, you should kill yourself.

 

[Baroque]

Wow. There's nothing wrong with a band doing a cover song. It's a chance to pay tribute to their influences and share it with their fans. Everyone starts out playing cover songs to learn their instruments anyway.

 

[CiG]

Nobody said there was.

 

[Baroque]

Easily as pathetic as any of Metallica's worst covers in the 90s, total embarrassment to the band.

Somehow this gives me the impression that HBB isn't too keen on covers in general

 

[HamburgerBoy]

I mentioned Metallica's 90s covers because they're usually (and rightfully) regarded as shit.

But yeah, most covers by metal bands seem pointless at best.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

Lombardo isn't shit compared to Simon Phillips

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

If you like it more than the original, you should kill yourself.

Says the guy who thought that traumatizing slayer song from their last album was good?

most covers by metal bands seem pointless at best.

Pretty much this.

 

[Manic Ferocity]

I made an account on this site to talk about and get recommendations about metal music, #disappointment

 

[no country for old wainds]

welcome to ultimate metal, i recommend you check out an evil shade of grey

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Lombardo knows like two drumming patterns and only compensates for it with massive, wanky fills (which often tend to resemble each other regardless). Slayer's a funny case for me in that while I often have faves because less liked or vice versa for albums or songs, they're a case where the most impressive instrumentation on first impressions because the least impressive on later (limiting things to 80s Araya of course). I mean, he's certainly not bad, but most of what makes the drums cool on the 86-90 albums is Rubin's production.

 

[The Ozzman]

Has TechBarb even heard Simon Phillips' drumming? Vinnie Colaiuta could run circles around Lombardo too in terms of drumming.

Seasons in the Abyss will always be my favorite Slayer record

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

Has TechBarb even heard Simon Phillips' drumming?

No, i own the drumless version of Sin After Sin

edit: Hold on, im guessing you didn't even know he was the drummer on that album?