VelociBrad
Spawn of Possession
There are no elitists on this forum.
Please stop misusing the word.
People would say we are elitists because of our "inflammatory opinions".
There are no elitists on this forum.
Please stop misusing the word.
I'll use Emperor as an example. I'm not really a fan of them because of their complex arrangements and (in my opinion) overblown theatrics. I prefer simpler, more monotonous black metal. I think Emperor (and other symphonic BM bands) are popular because of those things I just mentioned. I don't like the things that make them popular, but in the end it has to do with the music not the popularity.
I agree with you. I used Emperor as an example because they are relatively popular and Sapuramat had mentioned them. My point was that the type of music that Emperor (or Darkthrone, or Slayer, or Carcass, or Death, or any number of well known metal bands) both makes them popular but can also turn people away. This is not because those people dislike popular bands, it's that they dislike the musical elements that make those bands popular. I connected it with pop music because I think as metalheads we can all understand having a minority taste in music. Some people have a minority taste in metal.I realize that Emperor might be considered popular in the metal community; but if that's the case, then a band such as Darkthrone enjoys about the same height of popularity, I would say. I doubt you'll find very many people who listen to Emperor who haven't at least heard of and know some songs by Darkthrone. Both bands performs different styles of black metal, but each band enjoys its own brand of popularity and its own fanbase.
"being a covert Christian who died of AIDS"
So I guess brain cancer is a euphemism for AIDs now?
Have you ever considered that the things that make bands popular may also make some people dislike them? Think of it as pop music vs. obscure music, but contained within the context of metal. I'm sure there's some pop music that you don't like because of things the artist did to gain mass appeal. It's not that you dislike popularity per se, just the elements that makes thing popular.
I'll use Emperor as an example. I'm not really a fan of them because of their complex arrangements and (in my opinion) overblown theatrics. I prefer simpler, more monotonous black metal. I think Emperor (and other symphonic BM bands) are popular because of those things I just mentioned. I don't like the things that make them popular, but in the end it has to do with the music not the popularity.
I do like plenty of popular metal, but I don't feel the need to justify myself by dismissing other people's dislike of those bands as baseless.
So basically you're saying the same things about bands that are obscure that DarkBliss and I are saying about the more "mainstream" acts. Of course quality is not based on popularity, how fucking stupid do you think we are? Besides, to deny that some metal "nerds" put down bands based solely on their popularity is displaying total ignorance. I can't count how many times I've heard some self-righteous twat say something like "I used to like Emperor, but they're too popular now, so I'd rather listen to Ophthalamia."
Have you listened to any black metal outside of Dimmu Borgir? They are atrociously over-operatic and use the whole idea as a gimmick so there is little to no black metal left in their music. I would say they are an image-heavy superficial bastardization of the aesthetics of black metal and they've pretty much always been that way. The image and gimmicky musical aspect just got progressively worse with each album. There really is no mystery why seasoned black metal fans dislike them.