Sigh. Apparently it's epic quote-a-thon time.
It's pretty self-explanatory? There is rock with groove (Down for example, Slipknot) and there is rock without (AC/DC, 80s glam, shit like that).
So what are Slipknot now? Groove Rock? Are you kidding me? And I thought Down were Sludge Metal/Stoner Rock? They seem like a strange band to try to lump in with Slipknot.
Pantera IS thrash. It is arguable for LOG but I see thrash elements. But even if they didn't, that doesn't change the fact that LOG is metalcore (which IS a genre of metal).
Oh, Pantera IS thrash? Because you say so? So they aren't Groove Metal anymore? Or is it that you don't consider Groove Metal to be Metal either?
I am not going to comment on a band who's sole track I've heard is a cover.
Fair enough, they're also 90's metal/nu-metal/groove metal. I'm sure there have probably been debates about whether they're worthy as well.
I fail to see how I've been talking in absolutes.
"Pantera IS thrash"
"Slipknot is fucking rock with groove. With the OCCASIONAL metal element."
"Those are not metal riffs, neither in composition nor atmosphere."
"Their RIFFS, were 90% ROCK-BASED. They are a ROCK band with METAL influences. Not the other way around."
As for your "points":
[*]Having slight metal influences does not make you metal.
I agree, I certainly wouldn't try and argue that Faith No More or Dub Trio for example are metal bands, even though they both have considerable metal influence and metal passages within songs. However all the Slipknot I've heard has much more than "slight" metal influence in it, all though I'm not sure how watered down that has become with time. As far as the earlier stuff goes though I hear death metal, grindcore, thrash metal and groove metal in there with all the rest of the influences. Couple that with the metal guitar sound, drum sound, aggressive vocals and metal image (albeit metal image for 13 year olds), and I don't see how you can can that "slight metal influence".
[*]Slipknot's riffs are not metal in either composition or atmosphere.
That's not a point, that's you stating a generalised opinion.
[*]What sets them apart from bands like Pantera and Lamb of God, is that they are actually BASED in metal, and actually reside in established metal genres. Thrash and metalcore respectively.
See above.
[*]Having one "metal" song in your discography doesn't make you metal either, so pointing out one song is pointless as a counter-argument.
We've been through that. I told you I could've posted many songs. Would you like me to post a bunch of youtube links? I'd prefer not to, considering you tried to argue the song I did post was rock anyway. What would be the point?
And I've done the same. The fact that I'm doing it in a semi-arrogant manner, does not make my points any less valid.
Well probably not, because most of your "points" aren't really very valid to begin with.
Except... I have not made obvious logical fallacies such as calling out the arguer rather than the argument itself, constantly dodging and evading, etc.
Oh fuck off. I called you out once, I've spent the rest of the time calling out and trying to work out what exactly your "argument" is. As I've already stated, all you do is bark opinions at me as if they're fact. That's not debating.