Controversial opinions on metal

Hahahaha. You really are a dumb cunt.



Magazines often archive interviews with bands that have massive followings. Show us where they said it.



Wrong. You're the only one doing that.



You don't have a brain either, it would seem.

See this is what I mean with the ego. We have CASSETTEISGOD here thinking he knows better than myself in what my tastes are in music. I like blues based riffs, like the one from the song` Black Sabbath`, that is a good blues riff from Iommi.

This idiot then goes on to re - re - repeat something I have repeatedly answered and shown myself to be correct many times during this thread, the pre-internet one. This fool thinks that everything pre-internet is online.

His other posts are pure ego, with the puerile name calling and making statements that only in HIS opinion are true. See, there is no such thing as the truth to some people, only the individuals own subjective perception. CASSETTEISGOD is showing his immaturity. He is another one that is chucking his dummy because someone thinks Black Sabbath arent `heavy metal`, it is amusing to watch. However I discuss things, I dont argue. If Ozzy came in here and said that he doesnt think Sabbath is `heavy metal` it is clear that CASSETTEISGOD would start with his performance on Ozzy. He is embarrassing himself infront of everyone.
 
The term was used in literature first. Steppenwolf used it as a song lyric later. Then it was used as a musical descriptor around 1970 for Humble Pie of all bands by Mike Saunders, who then went on to review Sir Lord Baltimore and use the term for them as well.

A lot of bands were referred to as heavy metal around that time that aren't viewed that way now. I don't personally view Led Zeppelin or Uriah Heep as heavy metal and neither do most people anymore, but they were included in that group. Black Sabbath, on the other hand, has all of the characteristics that people associate with traditional heavy metal music.

Id agree with ALL of that except that I also dont see Black Sabbath as `heavy metal`. They are more Hard Rock. But thats my opinion.

Id also add that the people whom you are naming, I havent heard of i.e. Mike Saunders, if he is a journalist ( I dont know) , I am UK and it was in `sounds` magazine that the term `heavy metal` was coined here. But all along the same lines yes.
 
At this point, you basically have to admit that people called them heavy metal in the 1970s though, contradictory to what you claimed earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
I'm willing to admit Black Sabbath weren't a completely heavy metal band in the beginning, but many of their songs are undoubtedly blueprints for heavy metal.

But, I am absolutely not willing to admit that heavy metal doesn't become a genre until 1980 and beyond. In my opinion, heavy metal is a fully formed genre by the middle of the 70's.
Objectively by 1976 with the release of Sad Wings Of Destiny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elric of Melniboné
I don't see how anyone can really say that songs like Children of the grave or Symptom of the universe are more hard rock than they are heavy metal. I don't think Deep Purple were consistently a metal band but I certainly think Deep Purple in Rock was a metal album through and through.
 
Right. I'm the one trying not to lose face here. That's why you keep backtracking nd changing your statements.

I'd love an explanation for Mike Saunders' review of Sir Lord Baltimore in 1971 that calls them heavy metal or the big focus of Lester Bangs and David Marsh on music that includes Deep Purple and Black Sabbath with them using those terms from 1971 onward in Creem magazine. I would love to know how they used a phrase that Geoff Barton or whoever invented years later according to you.

I havent heard of Sir Lord Baltimore, or Mike Saunders and not really so much of Lester Bnags either. I havent heard of David Marsh either. Maybe they are a USA thing, I am UK. If he is the same person whom someone quoted as saying that Led Zeppelin are `heavy metal` then there isnt any reason to go down that path. I am UK not USA. So what you read there aint what I read here necessarily.
 
I don't see how anyone can really say that songs like Children of the grave or Symptom of the universe are more hard rock than they are heavy metal. I don't think Deep Purple were consistently a metal band but I certainly think Deep Purple in Rock was a metal album through and through.

You are joking right? `child in time` is heavy metal? lol

See, Blackmore was a Hendrix fan, his intro to speed king was Hendrix based, as were a few other of his riffs. So, do you think Hendrix was `heavy metal` too???

Yes those riffs by Sabbath I could see why people whom like `heavy metal` would like them, but to a Sabbath fan as myself, they are rock riffs. And I really like the acoustic part after the symptom song ends.
Children of the grave I dont like, I dont like Iron Man or paranoid either, sick of hearing them and they have done a lot better.
 
Lester Bangs and Mike Saunders both contributed to Rolling Stone magazine. David Marsh co-founded Creem magazine with Lester Bangs. They were not only famous in the United States.
 
You are joking right? `child in time` is heavy metal? lol

You think a heavy metal album must have 100% heavy metal songs? Fucking cringe.

If Ozzy came in here and said that he doesnt think Sabbath is `heavy metal` it is clear that CASSETTEISGOD would start with his performance on Ozzy. He is embarrassing himself infront of everyone.

Why would anyone care about what the vocalist thinks beyond generally respecting his opinion? Let me know when he starts writing riffs dickhead.

This fool thinks that everything pre-internet is online.

You're a liar, you didn't read shit and you can't prove it, even though Black Sabbath interviews from the old days are easy to track down. You're a bullshitter with piss for a brain. Why would I not be insulting you? You're an annoying retard and I'm not that nice most of the time.

Hasn't even heard Sir Lord Baltimore and he's trying to educate us on what is or isn't heavy metal.

So, do you think Hendrix was `heavy metal` too???

Doom metal bands use sabbathian riffs, does that make them not metal?
 
You are joking right? `child in time` is heavy metal? lol

See, Blackmore was a Hendrix fan, his intro to speed king was Hendrix based, as were a few other of his riffs. So, do you think Hendrix was `heavy metal` too???

I would say Child in time is metal in the same way Hallowed be thy name by Iron Maiden is metal. Do you consider Iron Maiden metal?
 
At this point, you basically have to admit that people called them heavy metal in the 1970s though, contradictory to what you claimed earlier.

I am Uk so I wasnt reading exactly what you were reading. I was out there going to the giggs and living it also. Thats where I got my opinions from.
Heavy Metal bands started in the next generation of bands after Sabbath, thats where it was, and yes, of course Sabbath is similar to `heavy metal` because what they were doing lead to that genre, but they were blues based and `heavy metal` that happened next was slightly different.
 
I could see an argument to say that Black Sabbath weren't a heavy metal band (at least on the early Ozzy albums) and were actually a doom metal band, given that the tempo of heavy metal is usually much faster, and palm mutes are used more often as a rhythmic device. That still makes them a metal band, though, at least if you're not willing to argue that every doom band is also disqualified from being metal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
Lester Bangs and Mike Saunders both contributed to Rolling Stone magazine. David Marsh co-founded Creem magazine with Lester Bangs. They were not only famous in the United States.

I never read any of those magazines in the UK. In the UK we read Kerrang! magazine and also `sounds` and `nme` music newspapers.
 
I would say Child in time is metal in the same way Hallowed be thy name by Iron Maiden is metal. Do you consider Iron Maiden metal?

Maiden are `heavy metal` in my opinion, yes. I know that rock riffs are very similar to `heavy metal` riffs, it is the nuances that there are that distinguishes `heavy metal` from say Hendrix or Deep Purple riffs that I consider Hard Rock ( Deep Purple that is- hard rock not Hendrix ).
 
I never read any of those magazines in the UK. In the UK we read Kerrang! magazine and also `sounds` and `nme` music newspapers.

That's cool. Heavy metal as a music descriptor was still used in the 1970s and Black Sabbath was one of the first bands to be called that. Whether you read about it or not is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
I could see an argument to say that Black Sabbath weren't a heavy metal band (at least on the early Ozzy albums) and were actually a doom metal band, given that the tempo of heavy metal is usually much faster, and palm mutes are used more often as a rhythmic device. That still makes them a metal band, though, at least if you're not willing to argue that every doom band is also disqualified from being metal.

Thats an opinion of course, and yes of course there are similarities as I have repeatedly said, ask Ozzy though, he doesnt think so.
 
That's cool. Heavy metal as a music descriptor was still used in the 1970s and Black Sabbath was one of the first bands to be called that. Whether you read about it or not is irrelevant.

In my opinion and also Ozzy`s opinion though, they arent `heavy metal`. I dont see Blizzard of oz `heavy metal` either. I see Randy Rhoads as a rock guitarist, amongst other things.

Rhoads best guitar lines, and really the majority of them are, are blues scales. He used all the classical scales too, but his most effective ones were blues based. In a sense Rhoads was blues / rock in that he was using blues scales. Of course the music itself wasnt blues, at least not in how it sounded.