Controversial opinions on metal

You're erroneously conflating 'angry' and 'aggressive' sounding music with 'angry' and 'aggressive' lyricism.

You can play in the most aggressive thrash band known to man but exclusively sing about galactic battles.

just because you play =/= are a good band who releases timeless albums
 
just because you play =/= are a good band who releases timeless albums

Agreed. That wasn't my point though. I was addressing your moronic claim that there is something 'poseurish' about being a thrash band for an extended period of time and how 'angry' and 'aggressive' can you be well into adulthood question.
 
Agreed. That wasn't my point though. I was addressing your moronic claim that there is something 'poseurish' about being a thrash band for an extended period of time and how 'angry' and 'aggressive' can you be well into adulthood question.

you didn't counter it, you did a shit 'not everyone is x' thing which does nothing

if you wanted to counter it, you'd have to address the 'element' part of the post
 
you didn't counter it, you did a shit 'not everyone is x' thing which does nothing

if you wanted to counter it, you'd have to address the 'element' part of the post

If you insist. You say the 'element' is 'young' and 'sexually frustrated,' that's also moronic considering I would say an important 'element' to making thrash metal is often political/social dissatisfaction, Nuclear Assault for example.

Are you saying there are no old(er) people who are politically/socially dissatisfied?

Again, you're conflating sound with lyricism, Tankard were always heavy as fuck but they, from day 1, seemed more happy than angry.

Your opinion is just a bullshit cliché.

Certainly there are bands that try to remain young by making angry songs about the local church or bullying and it's obvious that their heart isn't in it, but the idea that making aggressive music when you're older = poseurish ignores that there is a definite separation between aggressive, angry sounding music and the mentality behind it.

Vektor are heavy, aggressive and boast vicious vocals, yet they're a bunch of sci-fi nerds. Fine, you claim I'm just bringing up outlying examples, but how many do I bring up before your generalisation falls apart?
 
Last edited:
It was just a guess, the being young aspect I would say is near certain. Sexually frustrated not so much, but who knows what fuels what. (No snatch -> politically active) I wouldn't say political/social dissatisfaction is different from 'being' young anyways, why do you think the most socially 'revolutionary' of western societies are college aged kids and not the 40 year olds?

I said poseurish anyways. It's quite rare to find a group of music makers to be that angry in their late 30s or something, especially if they already created music to 'release' that frustration. Sure, it can happen but zzz with this lame response. Goes nowhere anyways

I don't get how Tankard isn't part of the poserish part, they seem to be a Municipal Waste type band now

Certainly there are bands that try to remain young by making angry songs about the local church or bullying and it's obvious that their heart isn't in it, but the idea that making aggressive music when you're older = poseurish ignores that there is a definite separation between aggressive, angry sounding music and the mentality behind it.

it's not that they don't remain young via their music, it's that they cannot produce that music anymore. It's not there, the creativity, the passion, whatever.

Vektor being sci fi nerds has what to do with being aggressive? Reading their about section on facebook just sounds like an angsty teenager looking to find a way to explore himself musically. I would say they are already losing it but their debut is really solid
 
Yeah, I can see we're just not going to agree on this.

Vektor being sci fi nerds has what to do with being aggressive?

It proves that you don't need the youth-fueled anger which usually reveals itself via the accompanying lyricism to make aggressive music. Vektor have something going on that they could keep doing well into middle-agedness.

If anything, Metallica sounded more mature during their first 10 years than they do now.
 
If Motorhead counts then so should Judas Priest, and if Judas Priest counts then they win no competition.

I don't personally view Motörhead as part of the NWOBHM because they were a little early, but Judas Priest has been around since 1969 and is definitely not part of the NWOBHM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG