Controversial opinions on metal

Speaking of genres, has anyone else noticed this on Meshuggah's M-A page:

Sooooo.... the last few albums somehow aren't "metal"?

Yeah they got too popular. It was fucking hilarious when it was discussed on the forum and people asked for non-metal that Meshuggah took after. The best they could come up with was a song by Stuck Mojo released a year after Destroy Erase Improve.

And of course they allow literal non-metal "dungeon synth" and "neo-folk" on the website.
 
They do that all the time. I think it just comes down to whatever the staff like or don't like. I don't listen to that type of thing so it has no impact on me but it seems weird to exclude certain bands. I think Meshuggah is crap but they're obviously metal.
 
I think what HamburgerBoy is talking about with that (and I might be wrong), is that some black metal doesn't have much in common with the original ideas behind metal in the 70s and 80s. Like if you listen to something like Transilvanian Hunger or Hvis Lyset Tar Oss, they're all about using repetition of simple riffs or melodies to evoke an ambient like atmosphere. This is something generally associated with other genres of music and not metal at the time. These records inspired thousands of bands, some which took it to further extremes which are the types of bands I think HBB refers to as "prefixed black metal".

Things obviously evolve and change over time so I don't think this invalidates them from being called metal, just because they had a different goal to the pioneers.