Controversial opinions on metal

There's very little hardcore in Metallica, Megadeth, Coroner, Mekong Delta, etc. Hardcore's influence on thrash seems kind of exaggerated actually, especially if you read interviews about the influences of the early bands. The two obvious and major exceptions are Slayer and Exodus, but in the former case it's mostly just in chord progressions from Hanneman (important but more to death metal than thrash on the whole), in the latter case it's attitude from Baloff (nebulous and hardly patentable) and the bringing of the skank beat from Hunting (something that probably would have come along by convergent evolution regardless). In terms of direct musical elements borrowed, death metal owes more to hardcore than thrash tbh.
 
The basic fast thrash beat came from hardcore though and that's pretty much what made thrash thrash originally. Pretty much all thrash features that beat, no matter how complex and/or melodic the riffcraft gets. And we are talking drum beats after all.
 
Last edited:
If you accept

1) Presence of a thrash beat defines thrash metal
and
2) The thrash beat came from hardcore

Then logically it follows that all hardcore with the same beat is also thrash metal. Obviously not true. Riffing plays a much larger factor.

Besides, stuff like Ace of Spades and whatnot was more or less on the same page anyways, drum-wise.
 
Let's see, thrash was heavily influenced by hardcore. Death metal evolved from thrash. Black metal came from Hellhammer, Celtic Frost, and Bathory, who were basically Venom with a heavy dose of Discharge. Sludge came from the Melvins, who were hardcore. Grindcore... don't even have to justify that one. So I'm pretty sure if you purged hardcore from metal you'd be left with power metal (and not even all of it) and doom metal (sans death doom of course).

So tell us again how metal and hardcore shouldn't mix.
 
If you accept

1) Presence of a thrash beat defines thrash metal
and
2) The thrash beat came from hardcore

Then logically it follows that all hardcore with the same beat is also thrash metal. Obviously not true. Riffing plays a much larger factor.

Besides, stuff like Ace of Spades and whatnot was more or less on the same page anyways, drum-wise.
I'm not saying it defines it, but it's a large part of what made thrash different from regular metal. I think the hardcore influence in thrash is much larger than you give it credit for.

Motorhead just played rock & roll faster than other people because they were off their dials on speed. Completely different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitiless Wanderer
Let's see, thrash was heavily influenced by hardcore. Death metal evolved from thrash. Black metal came from Hellhammer, Celtic Frost, and Bathory, who were basically Venom with a heavy dose of Discharge. Sludge came from the Melvins, who were hardcore. Grindcore... don't even have to justify that one. So I'm pretty sure if you purged hardcore from metal you'd be left with power metal (and not even all of it) and doom metal (sans death doom of course).

So tell us again how metal and hardcore shouldn't mix.
Saint Vitus and The Obsessed have a pretty strong hardcore influence as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
I'm not saying it defines it, but it's a large part of what made thrash different from regular metal. I think the hardcore influence in thrash is much larger than you give it credit for.

Motorhead just played rock & roll faster than other people because they were off their dials on speed. Completely different.

Hardly different. The idea of playing bass-snare-bassbass-snare fast isn't that novel. If drumming was such an important factor, Ace of Spades would be more hardcore than the Nervous Breakdown EP (a widely-considered early hardcore masterpiece containing zero skank beats). Without the riffing considered, drumming means nothing.

Weren't Metallica vocal about being influenced by early Misfits?

Hetfield was a fan at least, but the Misfits are barely hardcore. I'll admit that Motorbreath is almost a punk rock song, but it's one exception and one of their least thrashy songs regardless.
 
too high to reply, but let me try ... HBB 's right about a few things (riff=king) ... but i don't think anyone here is arguing that hardcore played a bigger role in the "creation" of, or was as important to thrash metal as heavy metal itself was.
misifts where hardcore? news to me. but then again i don't listen to them much. I much prefer Danzig's solo work.
 
too high to reply, but let me try ... HBB 's right about a few things (riff=king) ... but i don't think anyone here is arguing that hardcore played a bigger role in the "creation" of, or was as important to thrash metal as heavy metal itself was.
misifts where hardcore? news to me. but then again i don't listen to them much. I much prefer Danzig's solo work.
So what would you call Earth AD?
 
I'd call it an album released a year after Kill Em All had already been written and played live. It has its hardcore moments, as did the previous one to a lesser extent, but that wasn't really what defined them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG