Controversial opinions on metal

[TechnicalBarbarity]

Faggots defined it. As someone who grew up listening to metal in the 90's i can tell you the term "metalcore" was not used back then. I think its even funnier that people are trying to use the term to lump in thrash and hardcore bands from the 80's

 

[CiG]

Of course not, it was pretty much made up by the guitarist of Shai Hulud in the late 90's and only really caught on due to journalistic use in the 00's, and because of bands I just called mallcore he stopped describing his band and similar bands as metalcore and denounced the entire subgenre lmao. Faggots took all the great and diverse metallic hardcore from the late 80's and 90's and solidified it under a bastardized version of a subgenre a great metalcore guitarist practically invented to help describe what was going on.

I hope they all die of ball cancer.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

All im saying is metallic hardcore/heavy hardcore(which is what those bands terasope a listed, inclduing Shai, where called in the90's) are not metalcore and the subgenre was not "invented" by them. Metalcore are the bands that we just both referred to as faggots.

and btw Shai Hulud used the term for the fist time in the early 2000's if i am not mistaken, not the 90's.

 

[Sophii]

Matt Fox is an underrated master of guitar. Dude is super humble in person.

 

[Sophii]

terasope

Time to make me a bar of soap

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

Time to make me a bar of soap

is that bar of soap going to help you wash away how misinformed you are when it comes to what metalcore actually is?

 

[Sophii]

is that bar of soap going to help you wash away how misinformed you are when it comes to what metalcore actually is?

Its a possibility
I'm misinformed on a lot of shit.

 

[CiG]

All im saying is metallic hardcore/heavy hardcore(which is what those bands terasope a listed, inclduing Shai, where called in the90's) are not metalcore. Metalcore are the bands that we just both referred to as faggots.

Metalcore is just short for metallic hardcore, and all I'm saying is Matt Fox was using it before any of that gay shit existed.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

using a term has nothign do with with what the name of the actual genre of music they're playing is, a genre that came to life in the 2000's. We have went over this with plenty of other bands who did the same thing in plenty of other subgnres. And im telling you again it was never used in the 90's, when all of the bands you're talking about existed and where called heavy hardcore, metallic hardcore etc. DRI, Cro-Mags etc have absolutely nothing to do with metalcore.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

Its a possibility
I'm misinformed on a lot of shit.

well get Sedition to help you reach the places you cant

 

[Sophii]

well get Sedition to help you reach the places you cant

I'm a big boi
I can take care of myself!

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

you guys can use "proto metalcore" to describe those bands, which again where not called metalcore back then. But referring to DRI, Cro-Mags, Discharge etc as "proto-metalcore" is just 100% wrong.

I'm a big boi
I can take care of myself!

yea but im pretty sure he can do a far better job with those gigantic meat hooks of his.

 

[CiG]

using a term has nothign do with with what the name of the actual genre of music they're playing is. We have went over this with plenty of other bands who did the same thing in plenty of other subgnres.

It's not uncommon for subgenre tags to retroactively be applied, even setting aside that Matt Fox described his band's music as metalcore before mallcore/melodic metalcore even existed. Doom metal for example.

And im telling you again it was never used in the 90's

And again I'm saying of course, I never said the term was used then.

DRI, Cro-Mages etc have absolutely nothing to do with metalcore.

I never said they did.

you guys can use "proto metalcore" to describe those bands, which again where not called metalcore back then.

Not sure why you're saying "you guys" since I've never used the phrase "proto-metalcore" ever.

 

[Sophii]

At this point I pretty much dropped the argument. Tech made his point.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

It's not uncommon for subgenre tags to retroactively be applied, even setting aside that Matt Fox described his band's music as metalcore before mallcore/melodic metalcore even existed. Doom metal for example.

those are not subgenre tags. Those are just descriptions people used. Are Venom and Motorhead speed metal bands when that term was used to describe their sound by numerous people back in the days?

And again I'm saying of course, I never said the term was used then.

you said it was used in late 90's. no one used metalcore in the 90's. Some dude referred to their sound as metalcore in the 2000's, that doesnt equate to them "inventing" the subgenre(like you said), all that means is that they invented the term.

I never said they did.

Tera did, im responding to both of you

Not sure why you're saying "you guys" since I've never used the phrase "proto-metalcore" ever.

again, that was not directly in response to you, just saying you guys can use it to describe those bands y'all mentioned. And i find the whole "Proto" anything stuff to be nonsense. People need to stop using it as if they're some kind of subgnere of their own because we can literally start applying to dozens of bands from different sounds when it comes to whatever genre it is people are trying to apply said "proto-whatever" label to. its pretty ridiculous if you ask me.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

going to have to clear one thing up, i personally do consider Venom and Motorhead to be speed metal bands ... just pointing out that they're technically not considered to be speed metal as far as the definition of the subgenre goes. So i guess i can see why Tera would refer to bands like Shai Huluid, Converge etc as metalcore. My bad for pressuring you so hard twinkster.

 

[Sophii]

going to have to clear one thing up, i personally do consider Venom and Motorhead to be speed metal bands ... just pointing out that they're technically not considered to be speed metal as far as the definition of the subgenre goes. So i guess i can see why Tera would refer to bands like Shai Huluid, Converge etc as metalcore. My bad for pressuring you so hard twinkster.

Its okay big man, no hard feelings

 

[CiG]

those are not subgenre tags. Those are just descriptions people used. Are Venom and Motorhead speed metal bands when that term was used to describe their sound by numerous people back in the days?

going to have to clear one thing up, i personally do consider Venom and Motorhead to be speed metal bands ... just pointing out that they're technically not considered to be speed metal as far as the definition of the subgenre goes. So i guess i can see why Tera would refer to bands like Shai Huluid, Converge etc as metalcore. My bad for pressuring you so hard twinkster.

A lot of subgenres form from descriptors. Hard rock for example. First usage of heavy metal was "heavy metal rock" as we all know. Not really sure how to respond to that, sure doom metal is a descriptor but it's also a subgenre.

you said it was used in late 90's. no one used metalcore in the 90's. Some dude referred to their sound as metalcore in the 2000's, that doesnt equate to them "inventing" the subgenre(like you said), all that means is that they invented the term.

I said he and his friends used it in the late 90's, and then it became a popularized term in the 00's because of music journalists and yes because Shai Hulud used the term on their 2003 CD. I didn't mean it was used in the late 90's in the sense that thousands of people in scenes around the world were using it.

I also said he "practically invented" the subgenre and by that I meant that he was the first to identify specific elements that associate all these different bands and give it a name. Obviously all he did was shorten "metallic hardcore" to metalcore but the former is now an antiquated term and the latter prevails. I didn't mean that his band created the sound.

Tera did, im responding to both of you

again, that was not directly in response to you, just saying you guys can use it to describe those bands y'all mentioned.

Don't lump me in with someone trying to call The Cro-Mags "proto-metalcore" is all I'm saying lmfao.

And i find the whole "Proto" anything stuff to be nonsense. People need to stop using it as if they're some kind of subgnere of their own because we can literally start applying to dozens of bands from different sounds when it comes to whatever genre it is people are trying to apply said "proto-whatever" label to. its pretty ridiculous if you ask me.

It's really just a way to draw a link between a band that has similarities to a subgenre that developed after them. It can be a bit tenuous or even pretentious at times but it has its practical uses.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

A lot of subgenres form from descriptors.

i disagree with this. "Heavy" was used to describe a lot of other bands that later on when the genre was "officially" formed/recognized were not considered heavy metal. And Doom was used for bands that were influenced by an already solidified sound. Black Sabbath were a heavy metal band, the bands that were later largely inspired by them(or certain songs from them) were referred to as doom which is how that name got tacked on to Sabbath as well. Literally the same thing were talking about here as far as metalcore goes.

I said he and his friends used it in the late 90's, and then it became a popularized term in the 00's because of music journalists and yes because Shai Hulud used the term on their 2003 CD. I didn't mean it was used in the late 90's in the sense that thousands of people in scenes around the world were using it.

Ive never hear of anyone referring to heavy hardcore as metalcore in the 90's, including that band.

I also said he "practically invented" the subgenre and by that I meant that he was the first to identify specific elements that associate all these different bands and give it a name. Obviously all he did was shorten "metallic hardcore" to metalcore but the former is now an antiquated term and the latter prevails. I didn't mean that his band created the sound.

he created a term, one that would later be used to describe the actual subgnere of metalcore. That in no way equates to him inventing a subgenre dude.

Don't lump me in with someone trying to call The Cro-Mags "proto-metalcore" is all I'm saying lmfao.

try rereading what i say, i didnt "lump you in" with anybody. Im saying that proto-metalcore can be used to describe the bands that tera AND YOU are incorrectly referring to as metalcore just beacsue "hey they were hardcore and they played metal". So yeah, that response was to both of you.

It's really just a way to draw a link between a band that has similarities to a subgenre that developed after them. It can be a bit tenuous or even pretentious at times but it has its practical uses.

i dont think it does at all. its another term that seems to be tossed around by a lot of dudes who probably didnt even listen to metal growing up. You can literally tie strings to numerous bands form numerous genres if you want to go that route. Are Slayer proto death metal? Its meaningless. They even get applied to numerous bands that clearly were a part of said genre(and in some cases pioneers like Deep Purple) but these new school hipsters think they can use the "proto" nonsense to redefine genres/subgenres. Thats just not how it works

Not to sound like im sitting on a high-horse or anything, but this feels like im having an argument with dudes who started listening to metal in the 2000's via metalcore or something

 

[CiG]

i disagree with this. "Heavy" was used to describe a lot of other bands that later on when the genre was "officially" formed/recognized were not considered heavy metal. And Doom was used for bands that were influenced by an already solidified sound. Black Sabbath were a heavy metal band, the bands that were later largely inspired by them(or certain songs from them) were referred to as doom which is how that name got tacked on to Sabbath as well. Literally the same thing were talking about here as far as metalcore goes.

I actually tend to disagree with Black Sabbath being called a doom metal band so I can sympathize here, but setting Sabbath aside, it happened with bands like Pentagram and Pagan Altar and very few would dispute that they're doom bands.

Ive never hear of anyone referring to heavy hardcore as metalcore in the 90's, including that band.

I'm just going by what Fox has himself said in interviews.

he created a term, one that would later be used to describe the actual subgnere of metalcore. That in no way equates to him inventing a subgenre dude.

He didn't create that term to describe mallcore though, that's my overall point. He created it to describe bands like Shai Hulud. Other faggots took it later and used it to describe something else.

try rereading what i say, i didnt "lump you in" with anybody. Im saying that proto-metalcore can be used to describe the bands that tera AND YOU are incorrectly referring to as metalcore just beacsue "hey they were hardcore and they played metal". So yeah, that response was to both of you.

Anything can be, the point is I'm not.

i dont think it does at all. its another term that seems to be tossed around by a lot of dudes who probably didnt even listen to metal growing up. You can literally tie strings to numerous bands form numerous genres if you want to go that route. Are Slayer proto death metal? Its meaningless. They even get applied to numerous bands that clearly were a part of said genre(and in some cases pioneers like Deep Purple) but these new school hipsters think they can use the "proto" nonsense to redefine genres/subgenres. Thats just not how it works

The popularity of using "proto" mostly comes from proto-punk and that's where I tend to see its legitimacy as a tool, I've never been too invested in the idea of "proto-death" or "proto-thrash" etc etc because as you say it's basically meaningless. Proto-punk is useful for following the through-line from garage rock in the late 50's to the 60's into '77 punk rock.

Proto-metal might have some uses too, but most bands that get that label tend to have very specific subgenres anyway, like heavy psych for example. And like I said, it can definitely be tenuous and pretentious at times, it opens the door for a lot of wacky purely subjective shit.

Not to sound like im sitting on a high-horse or anything, but this feels like im having an argument with dudes who started listening to metal in the 2000's via metalcore or something