Cythraul
Active Member
- Dec 10, 2003
- 6,755
- 133
- 63
Obituary does suck. This isn't controversial.
Sure it is. The first two Obituary albums are bonafide classics whether you like them or not.
Obituary does suck. This isn't controversial.
Sure it is. The first two Obituary albums are bonafide classics whether you like them or not.
Hmmm...Okay let's say you are X years old.
Then everything that is at least half your age and that you consciously listen to a lot is a classic?
But... unlike Slipknot, both have EXTENSIVE metal elements to complement their groove... every track both Pantera and Lamb of God have put out has been primarily metal, so flawed argument.
- Lamb of God is metalcore/thrash/groove. Both metalcore and thrash are subgenres of metal.
- Pantera is thrash/groove. Thrash is a metal subgenre.
- Slipknot is fucking rock with groove. With the OCCASIONAL metal element. Does that make them metal? FUCK no.
I have listened to Slipknot quite a bit. My friend is a big fan. But even he knows they're not metal man.
Come on man, you're really smart... you've said a LOT of shit I wholeheartedly support... but why the blatant disregard of logic here?![]()
Controversial: The Black Album is Metallica's third best, behind MoP and RTL, in that order. Maybe tied with RTL, not sure but it's close.
My reasoning for this? Hetfield's vocals, plain and simple. He turned what could be rated a good heavy metal album and elevated it to greatness. I kind of wish he had concentrated on the vocals more in their earlier albums because they could have been fucking ridiculously good.
Ya I get that I'm on a little Metallica kick at the moment if you hadn't noticed, but I've always thought this. Who's with me?!!?
Like what? All the ya's and oh-yaya's, etc?