Commies can't scare people with an idea of hell after life so they have to create a hell on Earth. That's the only way the masses can be kept on control. Religions are bullshit yet very useful.Palmer Eldritch said:That's an interesting theory. Are there any explanations why exactly religious societies were "fitter"? Anyway, that sheds new light on the downfall of communism: the secular socialist states were naturally inferior to the God-fearing US of A.
Falconspirit said:Well only one thing is certain, "time will tell."
Mtine said:point is that he wrote a fictional book but put elements of reality (or what reality is for alot of people) in it. Thats the thing that makes you think about it a long time after you finished it. thats all actually. you really should read it
marginalé said:why are whe small? and for what are we too small?
thats such an important, mehdi...spot on.breaklose said:youre not supposed to get a whole hierarchy in islam either, as in priests, bishops etc, supposedly, but most muslims forgot that bit. and the bbc wont tell you about that either.
Har* said:Commies can't scare people with an idea of hell after life so they have to create a hell on Earth. That's the only way the masses can be kept on control. Religions are bullshit yet very useful.
Sopel said:i do doubt that time will tell us anything. it's not certain thing anyway, that's my point.
Don Corleone said:thats such an important, mehdi...spot on.
islam has no priests, bishops, fathers, sisters...it is clearly stated in the Quran (over and over for emphasis) that there must be no one between the believer and Allah. all one needs to do is pray.
for instance, in islam, there is no religious representitive, like a father, to forgive someone's sins.
Don Corleone said:thats such an important, mehdi...spot on.
islam has no priests, bishops, fathers, sisters...it is clearly stated in the Quran (over and over for emphasis) that there must be no one between the believer and Allah. all one needs to do is pray.
for instance, in islam, there is no religious representitive, like a father, to forgive someone's sins.
ikeaboy said:ah i must in the good books, blacky never took my posts apart lads, phewww
Palmer Eldritch said:Now, I know next to nothing about Islam, but to me it seems to be the same conglomerate of a few influential old men like in Judaism and Christianity. You know, the guys with the beards that demonstrators like to have on big pictures.
Does the fact that they can't forgive someone's sins make them less threatening figures? The Iranian conservatives for instance don't seem to think that religion is something between you and your God.
aha thats the common misconception about islam. those guys with huge beards that demonstrators carry their pictures of: they are just leaders who have money and power and would like to keep it that way by abusing islam and distorting it.Palmer Eldritch said:Now, I know next to nothing about Islam, but to me it seems to be the same conglomerate of a few influential old men like in Judaism and Christianity. You know, the guys with the beards that demonstrators like to have on big pictures.
Does the fact that they can't forgive someone's sins make them less threatening figures? The Iranian conservatives for instance don't seem to think that religion is something between you and your God.
sorry but you dont know enough to say this. you do not know if there is a creator or not. there might be. but the creation itself could be the creator.LostRose said:Nature can at the very most be a work of art; it cannot be the Artist. It is an embroidery, and cannot be the Embroiderer. It is a set of decrees; it cannot be the Issuer of the decrees. It is a body of the laws of creation, and cannot be the lawgiver. It is but a created screen to the dignity of God, and cannot be the Creator. It is passive and created, and cannot be a Creative Maker. It is the recipient, and cannot be the source.
calm down you!!!!LostRose said:O you obstinate denier! Your egotism has made you so stupid that somehow you decide to accept a hundred impossibilities all at once. For you yourself are a being and not some simple substance that is inanimate and unchanging. You are like an extremely well-ordered machine that is constantly being renewed and a wonderful palace that is undergoing continuous change. Particles are working unceasingly in your body. Your body has a connection and mutual relations with the universe, in particular with regard to sustenance and the perpetuation of the species, and the particles that work within it are careful not to spoil that relationship nor to break the connection. In this cautious manner they set about their work, as though taking the whole universe into account. Seeing your relationships within it, they take up their positions accordingly. And you benefit with your external and inner senses in accordance with the wonderful positions that they take.
If you do not accept that the particles in your body are tiny officials in motion in accordance with the law of the Pre-Eternal and All-Powerful One, or that they are an army, or the nibs of the pen of Divine Determining, with each particle as the nib of a pen, or that they are points inscribed by the pen of Power with each particle being a point, then in every particle working in your eye there would have to be an eye such as could see every limb and part of your body as well as the entire universe, with which you are connected. In addition to this, you would have to ascribe to each particle an intelligence equivalent to that of a hundred geniuses, sufficient to know and recognize all your past and your future, and your forbears and descendents, the origins of all the elements of your being, and the sources of all your sustenance.
To attribute the knowledge and consciousness of a thousand Platos to a single particle of one such as you who does not possess even a particles worth of intelligence in matters of this kind is a crazy superstition a thousand times over!