Dexter_prog
New Metal Member
+1, can't not trust Ermz abilities and having a nicely processed bass tone could help me as reference
I could contribute with some music, DI's or mixing the backing track (only if Ermz is too busy, cuz his backing was awesome)
Example:
PS: I'd also vote for dry bass, as most of my guitar tones really need a matching bass tone to sound 100%
The more mix elements you have, the more it narrows the field. Pre-mixed vocals once again would define how you would have to disperse midrange in your guitar sound.
There really is no simple solution here unfortunately, without taking this whole competition further into the realm of a 'mix comp' rather than a 'guitar comp'.
Whatever you guys decide in the end, I'll play ball.
Can I still participate even though I'm sponsoring?
concerning bass, what about both? A pre-processed track for those who don't want to process it themselves and a DI for those who feel the pre-pro won't fit their tonesWhat about sticking with the guitar tone competition idea, but allowing everyone to record the guitars themselves? Surely forcing different recording chains, players etc. into the equation will foster diversity as well.
The mix competition thing doesn't really stay true to the idea of what this whole thing is about. You can find a mix comp on any thread where someone has put up some tracks for mixing. It's a well-treaded area... this is something different.
But wont that cause issues for the guys that actually aren't guitarists (Not that i imagine there are many of those on here lol), or the guys who can't actually play well enough to track it properly?
Phil
Isn't it more realistic if the bass was pre-processed? I'm sure Greg doesn't get unprocessed bass sounds when he reamps stuff, and look at how great his work is?
There's a month to submit the re-amped guitars, it's supposed to be a challenge, getting a tone to fit the existing track is going to be more of a challenge than processing your own bass to match your tone. Plus, it keeps an even playing field.