illidurit said:no, unmusical because their intent is to be noisy, dissonant, random, and 'hypnotic'
illidurit said:if it wasn't their intent, then their music wouldn't be that way
illidurit said:esoteric is drawn out, sunn is obnoxious
illidurit said:lol I have better taste than 99% of UM but I'm a moron because I hate a boring unmusical band
Endar said:assuming tastes are completely relative, how can you compare yours with anyone else's taste ? (btw I don't say that to defend sunn 00 ))) thing, I don't know them hehe)
illidurit said:simple really, I like good bands, while Tubbs for example doesn't
NineFeetUnderground said:so someone coming up to you saying Opeth is horrible, and Sum 41 are the best band ever, or at least better than your beloved Opeth....wouldnt bother you at all?
obviously this is an extreme example...but your question of this seems to be questioning the entire thought of taste in the first place...so i thought it was a valid point to make.
edit: theres critics for every form of art and expression. there are critics for a reason. and there are different levels of creativity...both produced and perceived...for a reason. a 3 year old finger painting isnt of the same quality that a vincent van gogh painting is. argue this all youd like, but it should be pretty obvious. not everyone's brain is wired to appreciate everything the same way either, or on the same level. and i also feel some people have a better understanding for things than others. im not saying im the most qualified...but theres people who can read a fairly easy poem 300 times and never make heads or tails of what its saying. the same can go for music, art, film, literature, etc. some artists are more capable of impressive work than others, and some listeners are more capable of appreciating or at least understanding certain output than others are.
NineFeetUnderground said:in a perfect world. everyone should stop killing eachother. and stop smoking. and stop ruining the o-zone layer. and yada yada yada. but its probably not going to happen. who are you preaching to? theres bigger fish to fry if you want to start singing michael jackson ballads with children of every race circled around you here.
Endar said:hahahahahaha
hey man, I am not trying to make you all sign or to start myself a sect, I'm just explaining how I see the "taste" concept .
You seem to have a pretension that you are above any genre defining bands. I think you might have pissed off any melodic death metallers by that post . Also Dark Tranquillity are completely different than In Flames, who until R2R were at the top of the pile for death metal. Try listening to some Colony or some Subterranean even and tell me about predictability.NineFeetUnderground said:dark snore-illity really isnt that amazing on ANY album in my eyes. in the past they were decent for melodic death metal. and in the present theyre decent for melodic death metal, but theyre just as predictable as any in flames material, but they have a pretention that theyre above that which i find pretty humorous.
metal_wrath said:You seem to have a pretension that you are above any genre defining bands. I think you might have pissed off any melodic death metallers by that statement . Also Dark Tranquillity are completely different than In Flames, who until R2R were at the top of the pile for death metal. Try listening to some Colony or some Subterranean even and tell me about predictability.
lol @ Dark Snore-illity, what a bad joke.
ps. My sig pwns yours
NineFeetUnderground said:oh im sorry. ARE YOU A FUCKING PSYCHIATRIST?! did i ask you for your opinion on how i should behave? or how i should think? theres too many of you symphony X loving tree huggers around here, im not about to even entertain the idea of becoming one because i make you cry about the garbage you people listen to all the time. please.