Hair metal is the most obnoxious, vapid, shallow, narcisstic, money hungry, trendy, image-obsessed, corporate owned, trashy, androgynous, dogshit to ever smear it's godawful fucking legacy on the face of music as a whole. Anything that contributes to the demise of that fucking idiotic trend is great in my book. The best thing to happen to all those limpwristed transsexuals is the fact that they are all now washed-up, lethargic pieces of shit playing county/state fairs and can barely waddle themselves onto the stages, which is exactly the hellish, musical purgatory those cocksuckers deserve. I saw Faster Pussycat with Quiet Riot in my small ass town about 4 or 5 years ago, and it was seriously the most pathetic thing I'd ever seen in my life: wrinkly fat bastards squeezing 85% of their lard rolls into the same fugly spandex/pleather clothes they wore 30 years ago, and barely able to force themselves to make it through the same overplayed radio bullshit they've been playing for a fucking meal ticket for the better part of the past 30 years. And it's DISGUSTINGLY obvious that they're all just doing it to make a fucking buck to pay for their 14th divorce too. You can tell they have zero fucking energy, they're all about to lay down and die right there on stage. FP's vocalist looked like The Creature that Ate Marilyn Manson, and every other band member hadn't been treated much better by Father Time.
That whole "scene" was literally based entirely on image: "oooh look at us, we live to excess, look at our (women's) clothes that we spent thousands of dollars on, ooh sex drugs and rock n' roll are cooooooooool". No you're just a tool, there's a reason thrash guys used to beat the snot out of those queers on the street. They didn't do it for a genuine love for music, they did it to bang sluts, buy drugs, and make a bunch of money, which they obviously all did.
You talk about how they wrote great songs and were such great musicians...yeah sure, the guitarists could shred, but the songs were all pedantic, predictable 4/4 nonsense. It was literally vapid pop-music wrapped up in a pseudo emotional and wannabe bad-boy image, replete with songs about women, drugs, and rock. How predictable. You complain about how grunge was whiny and emotional, all of your favorite bands biggest songs were power ballads, crying about a woman, which was nothing but pandering to hormonal teenagers anyway, because they spent every second on tour cheating on their wives by fucking the brains out of every underrage piece of flesh that came their way. At least grunge has SOME level of authenticity to it. Nirvana was just some dumb fucking kids playing their brand of rock in a garage. They trolled MTV by refusing to play to a backing track of their own music, instead of being the channel's beaten mewling curs, begging for airtime like hair bands. And I don't even LIKE Nirvana very much; they're my least favorite of the top names in the genre, Alice in Chains being my favorite, easily. And again, because of the authenticity; anyone could PLAINLY hear the anguish in Layne's voice, begging the listener not to make the same mistakes he did pertaining to drugs, not promoting drug use and promiscuity to teenager like your empty idols spent a decade doing hahahaha.
If you really think that AIC, Pearl Jam, Nirvana, and Soundgarden (just to name a few of the very most popular examples) sound remotely the same, you're either Helen fucking Keller or being willfully ignorant for the sake of being argumentative. I don't even know how they are considered the same genre, as "grunge" seems to be a mostly amorphous blanket term for 90s alternative rock. Not a single one of them was nearly as poppy as any band you've listed, and if you criticize them for writing simplistic songs, while listening to literally the weakest, most simplistic form of metal (and I use that term EXTREMELY loosely), you're a fucking hypocrite. 90% of hair metal was bland power chords in a verse-chorus song structure.
Your utter lack of self awareness would be hilarious if it wasn't so embarrassing. You literally said "grunge didn't kill anything" and "grunge killed good music". Which is it?? Make up your mind, you senile old bastard. And by the way, you're partially right with the latter statement; grunge did contribute to the death of something, but it sure as fuck wasn't GOOD music, maybe just opened up the eyes of those waking up from the slumber of the 80s to realize, hey, we've been spoonfed bland, shallow, androgynous dogshit for like 10 years now, maybe some music with substance would be cool.
You wanna talk about lyrics? Ok. AIC wrote songs about the deep pain of drug addiction, the Vietnam War, etc.. Eddie Vetter wrote a really touching song based on that guy that Into the Wild was about who wandered into the Alaskan wilderness and sadly died there, the song being about the need to be free over the desire to belong in society. Granted, perhaps not the most incredibly metaphysical or philosophical subject matter, but at least it came from a place of authenticity. 95% of hair metal lyrics are about women and/or partying. The most intelligent glam song lyrically is that shit Dokken did for Nightmare on Elm Street. And by the way, this is all coming from someone who listened almost exclusively to glam/hair metal for over a year, even the less popular stuff like Kix, the obscure stuff like Wikked Gypsy, or the newer bands like Crashdiet and Reckless love. LOL even when listening to the most shallow music on earth, you're nothing but an entry level fan longing for the glory days.
I'm done. I can't even begin to address all the nonsenical horseshit you've spewed on this idiotic thread, most of it based in fantasy, not fact, and a pathetic need for nostalgia. Something about grunge bringing about goths?? Even I know that's absurd, and just to illustrate my point, here's a direct quote from Wikipedia: "The goth subculture is a youth subculture that began in England during the early 1980s where it developed from the audience of gothic rock, an offshoot of the post-punk genre". Goths were around before glam metal was hahahaa. I could MAYBE understand hating grunge if you were trying to compare it death metal, or something else more underground then two genres that were both Top 40 allstars for their repective decades, but you're trying to compare it to literally the weakest target possible. I really don't even hate glam that much at all, I still play some Ratt and Skid Row these days, I just hate your pitiful fucking attitude about it. Why are you going on a forum of strangers just spewing hate on something? Why even waste the energy on something you claim to hate rather than supporting what you love? Why not just let people enjoy what they enjoy? There's a fuckton of music I dislike, but I don't go around telling people on the internet how much I dislike them. And this is a METAL forum anyway, why is hating grunge even remotely pertinent? And besides ALLLLLLLLLL of that...who really cares?? This whole fucking debate has been beaten into the ground over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, time and time again since the early 90s. It's like constantly bringing up the fact that St. Anger sucks, or arguing over who's better, Metallica or Megadeth? It's a dead horse that autistic people keep beating and beating, and it's getting really old. So yeah, I've been watching this thread since it started and trying to hold my tongue, but since you keep spewing the same tiresome, monotonous rhetoric, I figured I'd kill a few minutes typing out some equally vitriolic shit. Fuck you, check into a nursing home ASAP, let your family forget you exist, and die propped up in a wheelchair in a puddle of piss, you illiterate dinosaur.