Ok, been silent long enough on this. I have been a part of this process from the beginning and I am just going to put it out there. The Secretary of the Navy is way off base on this and to say the things he is saying is flat out counter to the interests of national security and is unfair to the women who participated in this study.
We selected our best women for this test unit, selected our most mature female leaders as well. The men (me included) were the most progressive and open minded that you could get. The commander of this unit was a seasoned and successful infantryman. The XO of this unit was as good as they get, so good the USMC made her the CO of the Officer Candidate School. I just selected the SgtMaj of the unit to head up our senior enlisted academy at Camp Lejeune, NC. No one went in to this with the mentality that we did not want this to succeed. No Marine, regardless of gender would do that.
With our limited manpower we cannot afford to not train everyone to the best of their abilities. This was as stacked as a unit could get with the best Marines to give it a 100 percent success rate as we possibly could. End result? The best women in The GCEITF as a group in regard to infantry operations were equal or below in most all cases to the lowest 5 percent of men as a group in this test study. They are slower on all accounts in almost every technical and tactical aspect and physically weaker in every aspect across the range of military operations.
SECNAV has stated that he has made his mind up even before the release of these results and that the USMC test unit will not change his mind on anything. Listen up folks. Your senior leadership of this country does not want to see America overwhelmingly succeed on the battlefield, it wants to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to pursue whatever they want regardless of the outcome on national security.
On two different topics. First, guns and violence:
.
You've not once demonstrated that guns are the problem.
These chart lines look like they were made in MS Paint. Someone just sloppily drew in lines that fit the point they were trying to make.
One of my good friends was in the ranger class that passed three women. He said that 2 of them were beasts and one barely made it (a lot of people barely made it).
They aren't THE problem but they're PART of the problem. Just like easy access to guns isn't THE problem it's PART of the problem. Hicap mags isn't THE problem they're PART of the problem. etc etc etc etc etcetcetcectetct
Not everything has to be this OR that, there can be many facets to A problem. Which is my point. Why can't you guys fucking understand that?
Shoot the parents. With guns.
Didn't read the article, but the whole "Oh just give so and so a hug" thing parents do when their child clearly doesn't want to really is dumb.
I’m disappointed in the moms and dads who put a screaming baby on stranger’s lap because he’s suited like Santa Clause in order to attain that Family Photo for the Fridge.
Man, we must have a really submissive culture then, since you know, every child has been basically raised this way.When a child has been instructed to allow a person to touch them, without regard to that child’s requested boundaries, how can we expect them to reinforce those boundaries on their own?
Maddox is always relevant. Maddox is timeless.Is it 1999 again?
Sure. But is it condoning rape culture?Didn't read the article, but the whole "Oh just give so and so a hug" thing parents do when their child clearly doesn't want to really is dumb.
I can't imagine the environment and the mindset that a person has to ponder this type of question. I mean, holy shit.
Man, we must have a really submissive culture then, since you know, every child has been basically raised this way.
If I have a child and tell them to do something, you can be pretty sure they are going to do it.
That's the first of life's lessons; sometimes you have to do things you don't want to do, so suck it up and bear it like a decent human being.