HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,848
- 113
If Mort Divine ruled the world
- Thread starter Zephyrus
- Start date
YungVoidWitch
Member
As I have stated off of this forum, trying to explain things to you folks is like trying to have a fist fight with the ocean.
HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,848
- 113
Baroque
Active Member
Serjeant Grumbles
Active Member
- Mar 20, 2005
- 4,382
- 2,875
- 113
Then she was brainwashed by the patriarchy, obviously.
How is being a hate-filled bigot a means of survival?
http://the-distant-aidenn.tumblr.com/post/85031157676/i-saw-your-recent-post-about-the-term-sjw-and
Pretty much. Bigotry is fucking bigotry, whether you're oppressed or not. If you spout bigotry and sexism, whether you're a woman, man, transgender, etc or not, you're a cunt.
Haha, you wonder why no one here takes you seriously. (Protip: its cause you're an insufferable bleeding twat tbh.)
Also don't make me bring up that you were the original "resident pedophile" on these boards tbh; may want to think about that before you start implying things you really don't want to be implying.
Haha, you wonder why no one here takes you seriously. (Protip: its cause you're an insufferable bleeding twat tbh.)
Also don't make me bring up that you were the original "resident pedophile" on these boards tbh; may want to think about that before you start implying things you really don't want to be implying.
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
I don't want to be "taken seriously" by the likes of you.
Also yeah, sure, when I was 18-19 or so, but clearly I've moved beyond being a complete piece of shit.
And no, oppression matters. Hating ones oppressor is complete natural and completely defensible.
Also yeah, sure, when I was 18-19 or so, but clearly I've moved beyond being a complete piece of shit.
And no, oppression matters. Hating ones oppressor is complete natural and completely defensible.
HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,848
- 113
Serjeant Grumbles
Active Member
- Mar 20, 2005
- 4,382
- 2,875
- 113
Except that your personal dictionary defines oppressor as simply belonging to a more privileged class. You could be the most progressive-minded person in the world, but you're still an oppressor by that definition. It's all just a black-and-white, Manichean dichotomy between the wicked oppressors and the righteous oppressed. Oppression "matters" in that it exempts the latter group from observing basic decency.
I don't know why I didn't respond before, but it's impossible for a woman to rape a man, because rape = coercion + power.
SentinelSlain
Suck my joined date.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 10,015
- 153
- 63
SJW's are retarded and they are generally in a fucking massive us and them dichotomy between themselves and an imagined reactionary white male mass, that might soil their beautiful cultural indian carpets and vomit on the chinese arts and crafts. It's a load of bullshit.
Einherjar86
Active Member
Could you explain... well, both of these a bit more?I'm not sure exactly how you're juxtaposing these two statements. Are you suggesting that because the word "rape" doesn't specify gender that its meaning somehow trumps the historical details of particular cases? I would say that I disagree entirely; "rape" has no singular meaning, it has a historical meaning - and that meaning strongly connotes sexual violence committed by men against women.
Trying to remove the gender dynamics from a word like "rape" is similar (in an American context) to trying to remove racial dynamics from a word like "slavery." Throughout the past multiple peoples have been enslaved; but there is a specific racial component to pre-Civil War plantation slavery that cannot be extricated from use of the word. If the abolitionists had attempted to outlaw slavery in the nineteenth century by ignoring its racial components, they would not have gotten anywhere.
Finally - and this will likely be controversial - I want to suggest that rape, etymologically speaking, is tied to masculinity. That is, even the use of the term, going back to its roots, had very strong reverberations in a male-dominated hierarchy. The word in Latin originally meant to seize, and wasn't primarily used to signify sexual assault. Seizure gets us to property. While it was the case that Roman women could hold property, the means of doing so were less available to them and highly regulated, and there was no preponderance of property-owning women that rivaled the men. So, while rapere eventually came to mean "snatch," or even "seize" in a less loaded sense, we can imagine that its original creation/use developed within a set of property relations involving men.
Coincidentally, there is a Latin word used specifically for sexual assault (if I recall correctly); and it also carries along with it a specific masculine connotation.
It is often tempting to think that the words we use somehow free us from historical happenstance or political/ideological conditions, but this simply isn't true; words carry profound histories along with them.
Dak
mentat
Krow
Garbage Connoisseur
He brought two flunkies he knows from elsewhere to agree with him here. (Seriously)
And apparently cries about this board on other corners of the Internet.
If you take issue with the existence of a thread like that then you do not belong on this forum. Have a nice day.
Constuprare, perhaps?
Einherjar86
Active Member
Stuprare simply means to have illicit intercourse. The prefix makes it mean forced illicit intercourse.
Pagan Savior
Member
- Mar 21, 2015
- 182
- 2
- 16
I wouldn't recommend that - the salt water will make a real mess of those Hot Topic gauntlets
The Ozzman
Melted by feels
Log out and delete this link from your favorites then. If it's that much of an issue, what compels you to continue to be here?
SentinelSlain
Suck my joined date.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 10,015
- 153
- 63
Similar threads
