If Mort Divine ruled the world
- Thread starter Zephyrus
- Start date
rms
Active Member
I just don't understand why someone who isnt asexual is with someone who is. I mean you must get aroused by her in some capacity. I definitely don't understand how people cannot enjoy a biological function regardless, but whatever
Dak
mentat
Toxic brew of chemical castration(and/or the female equivalent) and all the uncertainty pumped into them for the sake of consumerism.
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
You mistake absence of sexual attraction for lack of pleasure derived from sexual activity
Our relationship is not completely non-sexual. I will not elaborate on that specifically, but I don't mind other questions being asked regarding our relationship.
As for how a sexual individual could be in a relationship with an asexual person? I love her and enjoy being with her, all there really is to it.
Our relationship is not completely non-sexual. I will not elaborate on that specifically, but I don't mind other questions being asked regarding our relationship.
As for how a sexual individual could be in a relationship with an asexual person? I love her and enjoy being with her, all there really is to it.
Dak
mentat
Not really. Fertility levels already aren't replacement level in countries where this stuff is a thing. All the bleedingheartkins better start advocating for Muslim genocide or start having babies (if this confuses anyone, I advocate for the latter), because at the current rates of procreation, the future belongs to the followers of Allah. So much for the Enlightenment.
rms
Active Member
But does she touch your winky? Does she feel bad that she is a weird minority of people that don't enjoy sex at all near the same level as everyone else and take one for the team? And does she resent you for that? Or vice versa, do you sacrifice your interest for sexual pleasure because you like her emotionally and thus resent her forever?
I don't get your islam reference to birth rates, dak!
Dak
mentat
rms
Active Member
Maybe i'm out of touch, unless you're referring to the wars/killings as a means of population control?
Dak
mentat
No, I mean that Muslims have babies and mostly no one else does. Now, "westernized" Muslims have less babies than the non-westernized muslims, but still more than non-Muslims. Simple demographic prediction. Frankly I'd just tell my kids that if push came to shove to start praying 6 times a day or whatever it is, since it's all bullshit. But Sharia Law becoming The Law gets conservatives and liberals in an equal tizzy, although they apparently haven't the foggiest on how they contribute to the probability of it being the case. They want to be able to Tweet the solution or watch O'Reilly spin one.
MasterOLightning
Optimator
White people need to start having babies again, because North America and Western Europe have negative population growth if you don't include immigration. Any population above replacement level is gaining rapidly on them. Need to bring back that old fashioned Catholic family planning.
All this sexuality labeling stuff seems to be getting to a point where people who feel different are feeling left out on the LGBTQXYZ spectrum, so they have to find a label for what sounds a whole lot like a plain old low sex drive.
Maybe Mort can fill me in. Is there a better label than LGBT(Q) yet? It suggests the exclusion of some people with the current umbrella for the movement, so people just keep trying to append more things to it. Maybe there's a more inclusive title for non-heteronormative advocacy?
All this sexuality labeling stuff seems to be getting to a point where people who feel different are feeling left out on the LGBTQXYZ spectrum, so they have to find a label for what sounds a whole lot like a plain old low sex drive.
Maybe Mort can fill me in. Is there a better label than LGBT(Q) yet? It suggests the exclusion of some people with the current umbrella for the movement, so people just keep trying to append more things to it. Maybe there's a more inclusive title for non-heteronormative advocacy?
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
I've seen phrases like GSM (Gender and Sexual Minorities) which I like because it is inclusive without having a huge list attached to it
MasterOLightning
Optimator
That sounds more reasonable. Then you have the problem of the needs for trans advocacy being a lot different than those for asexual advocacy. It's understandable for there to be an alliance among these groups, but it's easy to imagine divisions too.
Dak
mentat
GSM is less fuck-you than LDGHFVFJSQTQTQ, but it's also a cellphone tech related acronym so I don't know if that will catch on. How about "Outerkin"?
MasterOLightning
Optimator
unknown
fuck ftagn
Onder
Active Member
- Apr 10, 2006
- 11,386
- 2,033
- 113
Yeah those two labels are the stupidest. Everybody fucking experiences sexual attraction only in limited circumstances. What the fuck.
Master_Yoda77
Juggalo
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
It is just meant to refer to those who kinda fall in between full on sexual and asexual.
Demisexual is a stupid term? How so?
Master_Yoda77
Juggalo
Similar threads
