HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
Primarily the former considering that
1) we have a hard-limit on the total number of legal immigrants
2) we have categories which specifically favor refugees from politically unstable nations
3) we have categories which specifically favor refugees from nations that have experienced disasters
4) we have diversity programs which specifically favor Africans
Obviously Norwegians aren't going to suddenly pour in by the hundreds of thousands, but right now, if you're a merely-good Norwegian, you're going to be waiting about a decade to get into the country. If you're a Haitian, very different story.
fwiw I'm sticking with 'Norwegian' just because it was the anecdote Durbin used; they're one of the least immigration-prone groups probably largely thanks to their incredible wealth, though thousands still come here. Things might not change wrt their emigration, but there are plenty of European nations that the same case could be made for.
1) we have a hard-limit on the total number of legal immigrants
2) we have categories which specifically favor refugees from politically unstable nations
3) we have categories which specifically favor refugees from nations that have experienced disasters
4) we have diversity programs which specifically favor Africans
Obviously Norwegians aren't going to suddenly pour in by the hundreds of thousands, but right now, if you're a merely-good Norwegian, you're going to be waiting about a decade to get into the country. If you're a Haitian, very different story.
fwiw I'm sticking with 'Norwegian' just because it was the anecdote Durbin used; they're one of the least immigration-prone groups probably largely thanks to their incredible wealth, though thousands still come here. Things might not change wrt their emigration, but there are plenty of European nations that the same case could be made for.