Illegal downloading / file sharing / pirating...
Dear Pyra-fans,
I've noticed that a debate has been going on, about the never-ending
story of illegal downloading of albums that have been leaked to the internet.
I've read lots of different statements both from people who use this "service"
and people who don't. There are pros & cons about most of it, but the people
who claim that it's just good for the industry/bands are wrong.
It is true that the internet and the possibilities to download songs are an excellent tool to help promote bands. But there is a big difference between promotion chosen by the band and the unintended leaking of an entire album before the actual release date. Let me try to explain. There are true fans (like most of the people on the forum) who have chosen to download the album because they are super excited about finally hearing the new stuff. They have every intention of buying the actual album too once it comes out, and that's okay and i can certainly relate to that. However there are people (lots of people!!) who also dig the band, but who will NOT buy the album once it's been made available to them for free. Those are the people who hurt the industry and the bands, and believe me when i say we feel this first hand. The average cd price for a newer album is about 14 $$ if I'm not mistaken, depending on what country you live in of course. Now here's the "surprise" - the band only receives 1,5 $$ of that amount. So it takes a lot of sold albums before we even get close to recouping the expenses we've had with producing the stuff. A good studio today costs about 800 $$ per day. If you're really fast and well prepared (which we are) the studio part can be finished within 25 days. Now you do the math, and remember that we get only 1,5 $$ per sold album. Then now bring in the factor of the people who download the album for free and never buy it - well, see where I'm going with this....?
Now lets talk about the artistic side of it. We've been working our asses off for over a year to finish this record. We've put lots of money in the production of the booklet and artwork to present the material in a very tasty way, and then suddenly the album leaks to the net as crappy MP3 files, no booklet, not the intended music quality, not the whole package as we would like to present it to the masses for the first time. This hurts - and while i have nothing against fans who download the files and then buy the album afterwards, it still hurts to not be able to present the album as we've intended. I know that today this scenery is pretty much inevitable, but saying that this situation is good for the bands is not true. It might be good for very new bands who do not yet have a record contract and need that kind of exposure, but for serious bands who already have a name and have to pay big bills to produce a kickass album it just doesn't work.
Now i would say that Pyramaze has become a pretty big thing within the last couple of years. But do you think we would be able to make a living from the band if we chose to only focus on Pyramaze?? The answer is a big NO FUCKING WAY! If we did not have our jobs, we would be living in the gutter (or in a crappy tour buss) ;-) This scenario is mostly because of the pirating issue. If every person who was interested in Pyramaze would buy the album, then things would look a lot different both for the labels and the bands, but they don't and that's a fact. Bottom line is we do this for the love of our art and for our fans. But no matter what don't kid yourselves into thinking that illegal downloading and leaking of albums is good for the bands nor the industry.
Well - this was a long "speech" and i could go on, but let me just end this statement by saying that we truly appreciate our true fans - the fans who actually support us by buying the album. And to make myself perfectly clear, i have nothing against the fans who have downloaded the album already, as long as you remember that there is an actual real album coming out soon.
All my best,
Michael Kammeyer