True but it has veen a gradual change over the last 16 years, and you never know, the whole album might be like The End amd it could be one of their best 'modern' albums
I admire your innocence. I remember, when I first registered here, it was among the first things I got into an argument about.
Pointless. No one in their right mind would change their band's name, because you make the band, not the band makes you. The name In Flames does not limit you, as a band member. If you want to make a record from Madonna covers, then that is In Flames now, simple as that.
And arguing it is pointless, because the sheer suggestion of it reeks from ignorance. Have you ever had people in your life trying to tell you what to do and always being so smart when you had to make a decision (especially after you already made one)? It's the same thing: people suggesting such retarded things as to change to band's name are just simply putting others cocks in the grinder. They do not care, they do not think, they are just selfish.
Bands usually change names if their singer dies or leaves (or gets arrested because he liked to fuck babies, lolol), while pop artists usually do it for gaining a better exposure, a new persona, ie. Skyler Gray or Miley Cyrus.
Also, let me put it this way, TheJestersDoor: If at 20 years old you are an avid atheist and at 30 years old you convert to a religion and change your entire lifestyle, what do you do? Do you change your name because you are not TheJestersDoor anymore, or is TheJestersDoor representing everything you are, were and will be?
Bonus question: would you still keep your name if a random guy who just finished jerking off to Colony tweets you "change your name lmao XDD"? Such a compelling argument isn't it?
Don't worry though, the guys here are not that stupid either, it just fits their narrative.