There's probably some universe on which Scorn is mediocre and Siren Charms an outstanding piece of art. But it's not this one.
No. It's just a nice tune played with a lot og sentiment. Does it hurt?Pallar is a song, where if you are a blind fan, you can write essays about how clever it is, and how it breaks the record, and such a soft song in the midst of these heavy riffing, blahblah. So basically explaining how a black dot on a white canvas is art. Maybe it is, but it really doesn't matter.
No. He really thiinks what he says. Probably caused by cognitive dissonance regarding SC.Jester Slave is a troll, right?
You can't really have a ballad with Marcus Bischoff, since his softest side was probably "Black Tears"One of the best examples of this is on Heaven Shall Burn's antigone. It's a crushingly heavy album, but they have an instrumental called Rísandi Von in the middle and then another one called Deyjandi Von at the end. They break up the heaviness nicely and, listening to the album from beginning to end, Deyjandi Von in particularly is a hauntingly beautiful way to end the album. Much better than a ballad would have been.
Scorn rules \m/I'm not attacking the album, it's not bad. I am mostly talking about Scorn.
You can't really have a ballad with Marcus Bischoff, since his softest side was probably "Black Tears"
I'm not attacking the album, it's not bad. I am mostly talking about Scorn.
Scorn is not good, Zombie is a B-side thrown around a solo, and Pallar is nothing short of average. The record is also too one-dimensional, and when it works it works, but when it doesn't, it produces B-side songs like Scorn.
Resin and The New World are the main filler tracks to me. I have always skipped them or been bored by them halfway through.