Yeah, chill. I never said Take This Life is a bad song. It’s a great song. It is one of my favorites from the second era as well. But it is a good song in more of a rock sense, not because it shreds my fucking face off and makes me raise the horns.
IN FLAMES new album being released on 1st March, 2019
- Thread starter Pallbearer
- Start date
krofius
Active Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 2,390
- 248
- 63
I know, but you're incredibly stupid. You do realise Take This Life is objectively the heaviest song on entire Guitar Hero 3? You got to be incredibly stupid if you think they would want to add something like Episode 666 on there. You make it sound like a big conspiracy, how about they got asked about having their new song Take This Life on the video game and they thought it was a really cool idea and also a good oppurtunity to get their music out to more people?
''THEY USED THEIR LEGACY TO PROMOTE NEW SONGS'' fucking lol
So maybe I have a problem with most of Guitar Hero then. My point is they got where they were by being literal guitar heroes. And they still remind people of that on a daily basis to show they still have the chops. To impress people. Old fans, new fans alike.
When I asked people in the U S about in flames before guitar hero, no one had a clue what I was talking about.
They exploded with popularity here after guitar hero.
They exploded with popularity here after guitar hero.
Thank you. And they got the job just like anybody gets a job. With a resume of previous amazing albums. So that both sides benefit. Guitar Hero by featuring a legend, and IF by promoting.
krofius
Active Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 2,390
- 248
- 63
Yes of course, Gutiar Hero was huge in US, gave them great recognition. Was during CC tour they really exploded, also won a grammy for CC in Sweden which was kinda huge at the time.
Of course bands get where they are because of previous records, how else would they make a name for themselves? It's the same for every band in history. If you think they play certain songs to impress people then I don't know man, I don't know what way you are thinking lol
Also Disconnected.
You're incredibly rude and impolite when answering to others. Not to say a complete asshole. Maybe because you lack actual social relationships so you don't know how to treat other people. But you'll come and say that you're not insulting people. Rubbish! You know what you're doing!
krofius
Active Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 2,390
- 248
- 63
Can't always be polite if you're being honest, I could sugarcoat it but after all it's the internet so there's no reason. I could say likewise as well.
krofius
Active Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 2,390
- 248
- 63
Because they were signed with Nuclear Blast, who obviously released the DVD???? They only signed for 1 album with sony cause they didn't know what they wanted in the future, and after the 1 album they signed with Nuclear Blast again, don't know for how many albums or if its album by album.
The dvd was supposed to be released by sony time before they even signed with nuclear blast. The logical conclusion is that Sony was not interested in releasing it because they had no confidence on the sales.
I might be arrogant and stubborn but I had to go a long way down before insulting people. I've done it? Yes. Sometimes. But you're way just too quick on doing this and it's no good for a conversation. Refute the arguments not the person.
krofius
Active Member
- Mar 16, 2009
- 2,390
- 248
- 63
Yes very logical conclusion, Sony dropped the dying band In Flames from their label due to their decreasing popularity. I mean what other conclusion could there possibly be?
No. You're misinterpreting what I'm saying. Sony hired IF. The albun sales were not as good as expected so there was no continuation to their relationship. Even you must know, I suppose, that SC was a low point on their career. Low ratings, bad critics and low sales.
Similar threads
