Well your point is wrong! LOTR is boring talking interspersed with some of the best battles everBlitzkrieg said:My point was the first film wasn't based around war like the other two.
You're doing it again. Your point WAS that it didn't have battle scenes. You said so. Look:Blitzkrieg said:My point was the first film wasn't based around war like the other two.
However, you are allowed to change your mind if you want to, and even clarify your point if your position is different from that which originally conveyed.Blitzkrieg said:The first film is probably my favourite of the three, and that doesn't even have battle scenes.
Blitzkrieg said:The first film is probably my favourite of the three, and that doesn't even have battle scenes.
I didn't change my point at all. In the first quote, by battle, I ment war type scenes, like the ones in the second two films, and the first film doesn't have any of those. It does have battles of a different nature, but I didn't think that is what Spawn was originally talking about, hence me saying the first film has no battles. I am not changing my arguements, I just didn't make it very clear.Blitzkrieg said:My point was the first film wasn't based around war like the other two.
A Bizarro Jar-Jar is the best thing about LOTR? I shouldnt expect any better from a Slayerless person like you, and what the hell does fucking have to do with anything?Spruce Goose said:My favotie character is Gollum, who isnt really involved in any battles. Any scene with him in it are brilliant.
Shut the fuck up all of you. There is only one trilogy to rule them all fucking!
what he said.Spiff said:LOTR, because the LOTR trilogy doesn't consist of one great movie, one awesome movie and one average movie full of Muppets. It consists of one awesome movie, one great movie and one awesome movie.