You simply can't accept any suggestions because of the only fact that the opposite hasn't been proved ! The current theory is in a state where it cannot be proved. This is why I will consider myself an Apatheist.
I know it's a belief from me, but I consider that any thesis should be proved by the ones who suggest it instead of the opposite. To me, it makes more sense, because it won't lead to any consequences due to the fact that the opposite hasn't been proved, which can/will eventually be proved. Unfortunately, being mostly skeptical, I don't think that anything can be proved, but we all know that there are choices to be made. We should only debate to know what would be better for us (to accomplish something) knowing that we'll never know, instead of thinking that there's a extremist and static solution to everything.
But I certainly agree with the fact that you can believe in lies (suggestions that aren't proved). Humans are professionnals at illusioning themselves, and it's understandable because of the complexity of our lives and the world. Umm and sorry to talk in the middle of a debate, but it was quite interesting to see your views. I think we should start a poll about the religions on this forum.
Since we are into religion and beliefs, I wanted to know your point of view on certain subjects that I had discussed with friends.
1. Do you believe in the "soul" ? Why ? How do you define this concept ?
2. Do you believe in the "fate" ? Why ? How do you define this concept ?
I don't believe in those, but I'm not totally sure if I am seeing them, these concepts, the right way. I'll show my reasons if someone wish to answer first.
@mexicola : Actually, being Atheist is to not believe in any sort of deities; there's not even probabilities; you totally neglect it but you sure can't prove what you say (which is why I don't consider myself this way). Therefore, you should look for another word that applies to your convictions. But I agree with the tea pot and the fact that it hadn't lowered the discussion.