DiscipleOfPlato said:Some of you are passing judgment prematurely. Recall that a sample invariably strips any given track of one very important characteristic; context.
Barking Pumpkin said:Shut up. Seriously.
Barking Pumpkin said:Just because I don't post essays about underground albums you think are the pinnacle of music while writing everything but about the music doesn't mean I don't contribute to the forum.
Extract a lump of shit from the context of a dogpile and, guess what? You're still holding a turd.
DiscipleOfPlato said:Anyone who's ever given a well-written record their time would have to agree that certain songs work better in the context of a grander scheme.
Laeth MacLaurie said:There is no past history of well-written records to be found in Cryptopsy's back catalog, so the "context" here is an unbroken streak of crappy albums, a framework this crappy song fits quite neatly within.
Laeth MacLaurie said:There is no past history of well-written records to be found in Cryptopsy's back catalog, so the "context" here is an unbroken streak of crappy albums, a framework this crappy song fits quite neatly within.
There is no past history of well-written records to be found in Cryptopsy's back catalog, so the "context" here is an unbroken streak of crappy albums, a framework this crappy song fits quite neatly within.
Krigloch the Furious said:you obviously dont like good music.
DiscipleOfPlato said:Fair enough. Cryptopsy's records are admittedly an acquired taste. They're not particularly well-structured or coherent, but some things are better than the sum of their parts.
Barking Pumpkin said:Watch closely people, this is where something called OPINIONS come in.