A: i'm a little bit more concerned about the answer.
Q: (with no offense to rahvin per se, obviously - just a general thought) don't you think that this "monster" labeling for larocque is a teeny bit exaggerated? i mean - right, he was a prick in a relationship of sorts that went bad. so was i in similar circumstances, and so was more or less everyone else, because as therapy? say there's nothing darker than love that's gone sour. he's also inclined to dish out platitudes more often than not, but so are most people, unfortunately. is that sufficient ground for taking him to be a madman?