Exactly. After all, a good song provokes a response, whether positive or negative. The only bad response you can get is no response at all.I think the fact that people either love this song or think it sucks mean we did something right....and the point of this forum is for exactly what this thread is discussing.... possible suckage or possible brilliance...I however cannot be objective so it's entertaining for me anyway..haha
I think the fact that people either love this song or think it sucks mean we did something right....and the point of this forum is for exactly what this thread is discussing.... possible suckage or possible brilliance...I however cannot be objective so it's entertaining for me anyway..haha
I like St. Anger...
Actually, that is the only Metallica album I find listenable
I like St. Anger...
Actually, that is the only Metallica album I find listenable
That's funny.
I knew one dude that loved St. Anger, and he was a metal producer. His reasoning made sense, too.
Since it was such a high budget, high expectation record, and they had access to all the latest and greatest technology and still did it half assed, cut & pasted and terribly recorded, he saw it as a giant 'fuck you' to the digital music paradigm.
I think the record is awful and unlistenable, but if you think of it as a big middle finger to digital technology and fidelity, then it might just be the most punk-rock thing Metallica ever did.
I like St. Anger...
Actually, that is the only Metallica album I find listenable