Okay, here is my take on after hearing both of those initial tracks and that second one by the "old-new" Queensryche (I actually like "Toddsryche"). After, all isn't that really the "old" Queensryche, but with a new singer? Also, I would consider "Tatesryche" to be the "new" Queensryche, since he is just the old singer, but with a new band.
Anyway, with that out of the way, after hearing that track by the "Toddsryche" version, I actually thought it was quite good. Did not blow me away, though, but did thought that was probably the best thing I've yet heard from any outfit with the "Queensryche" name since Promised Land. That second "Toddsryche" track, I through was actually better. Seems after reading most of the posts, I am in general consensus here.
Now, for that "Tatesryche" song. I will fully admit that I actually enjoyed it more than I thought I was, but then again, after that disaster that was Dedicated to Chaos, I was not setting myself to expect much out of that outfit. But still, it is not what I would care to hear from any band that is "Queensryche" and clearly shows that is still definitely Tate basically continuing on his ways for the past 20 years. As others have pointed out, yeah, there are some heavy moments, but it just seems to plod along. For S&Gs I went and looked up Frequency Unknown on Amazon and the reviews don't look pretty. So far, it has only garnered 2 1/2 stars. I went and previewed the samples on Amazon, and frankly it seems I'll be passing this one up. Admittedly, that fifth track "In the Hands of God" sounded pretty cool. Same with the 6th track, "Running Backwards". But three or four decent tracks an album does not make. Also, I just noticed something, when abbreviating the album name down to "F.U.", seems to imply another common, albeit vulgar, phrase, associated with those two letters. Wonder if that was intentional, like Tate basically saying a big F' YOU to both the original Queensryche and its fans. But then again, I maybe just reading more into it than is really there.