Einherjar86
Active Member
It's been years since I read it, and for all I know what I read was updated English (probably was). But the story itself is timeless and the characters archetypal, as opposed to TCT.
It wouldn't have been updated, Bunyan was writing in modern English. In class we actually discussed the heavily historical nature of its form and structure, since it's a Puritan narrative. Wolfgang Iser argues that it wouldn't have emerged in that form if Protestant Calvinism hadn't been the religious motivation behind it. Pretty drastic claim, but interesting argument; it's with Calvinism that Protestants begin putting lots of emphasis on signs and their meaning, since they believed their fate was predetermined. Thus, a narrative that actually functions partially as a pedagogical tool for interpreting symbols and events makes sense in a Calvinist context.