Finally got some George arar stuff. First of the most obvious series. Fingers crossed I need to poop often enough to finish it in a few weeks because that's the only place I read nowadays.
Finally got some George arar stuff. First of the most obvious series. Fingers crossed I need to poop often enough to finish it in a few weeks because that's the only place I read nowadays.
I never understood a dislike of trends. Why be against something that is apparently so good a bunch of people know about it? Granted if the trend turned out to be dumb that's another story.
I never understood a dislike of trends. Why be against something that is apparently so good a bunch of people know about it? Granted if the trend turned out to be dumb that's another story.
I didn't really get interested in the first GoT book until the last like 200 pages or so. I'm reluctant to read the second book, but I should out of principle. Malazan Book of the Fallen is higher on the list than that.
hey sup we 100% agree on something![]()
IDK. I see where you're coming from but anything that gets people on board with a generally good thing is usually an improvement to the human race, even if it is the watered down version.
Sometimes sheep herding is beneficial not only to the shepherds but the sheep themselves. And then when they're shorn, they have superior wool due to the joy of company, and getting regular meals, and those without wool of their own have clothing and blankets with which to stay warm.
Fuck, why'd I start reading again....
Anything that gets people reading is a good thing in my book. Even if it is something I have no interest in reading myself.
This is my contention. I was giving a tour of one of my campuses to some students, and in the library, a student pointed to the Twilight books and asked "Why are these here?" And I replied, "Even though you or I may not think they're good books, they're still books. If it gets somebody interested in reading, more power to them." This is something I stress to my students. You don't need to read David Foster Wallace, Dostoevsky, or Camus or whatever. I had a student last year who was 24 years old, and on the fourth day of class he told me he had never read a book cover-to-cover because all he was presented with in school was the canon. So I gave him a list of books by Bukowski, John Fante, Roald Dahl, etc. By the end of the semester he had read 3.5 books cover to cover.