I just thought of this subject and affirm its potential for a good discussion. At what point does hard rock become metal? I've heard various disputes over which bands, particularly of the 70's, should be called hard rock or metal (Rush for example). The Who aren't listed in Metal Archives but I bought a book that profiles them as a heavy metal band.
For two genres that use the same instrumental template there appears to be a blurry boundary between the two and it's been a debate on where to draw a more defined border.
This debate doesn't just involve the 70's but the decades after including the modern day.
The obvious differences such as heaviness and aggresiveness are the true factors but how heavy or aggressive does a band's music have to be to be called metal?
For two genres that use the same instrumental template there appears to be a blurry boundary between the two and it's been a debate on where to draw a more defined border.
This debate doesn't just involve the 70's but the decades after including the modern day.
The obvious differences such as heaviness and aggresiveness are the true factors but how heavy or aggressive does a band's music have to be to be called metal?
