fireangel said:
Dark Jester: but I did choose some examples of regions which are close, or the same, like the UK. Even though, some go on for a longer time, like NL mentioned, it´s just round the corner.
Northern Lights: I really wonder why it was not bigger in the press, but it was nothing minor! Who knows what was behind the scenes to make it being forgotten fast? Maybe other countries had good reason not to do much about it because they´ll have problems with their atomar plants, too?
It was not even in the small-pieces-section of my newspaper, only found it on the net.
Here is a
link, and you´ll find more with the search engines. It´s said to be the worst incident in the UK in ten years! During months there leaked 83.000 litres (!) highly radioactive liquid. And this does, Dark Jester, affect people in the UK right away, because radioactivity will be in the rain, the rivers, the sea and the food you eat. Of course it´ll spread throughout Europe, too... And then, if you think that for a little radioactive material politicians tend to accuse different Middle East and Asian countries, but when it flows freely in the North Sea, there is no-one upset.
It may just be around the corner, as you say, but, putting it brutally, it is not that unusual. Whenever ETA makes an attack, it is reported, and there is condemnation from the world. However, ETA attacks are not new, and just like with the Sudan, or human rights violations in countries with frequent repeated violations, the reptitive nature of such actions renders them rightfully or wrongfully 'unnewsworthy'. Why do you think that there is such media focus on things such as Guantanamo Bay and the Abu Ghraib prison facility? Because the West is held to a higher standard when dealing with matters of human rights. When a dictator in the Middle East, or Africa, or China, commits an atrocious act, it is expected, and does not appear newsworthy because in some cases, such as Zimbabwe, it seems to be 'business as usual'. When there is information of torture being perpetrated by the US,
that is newsworthy. Likewise with these attacks in London - due to the relative stability of the UK, and the lack up until now of a significant attack, that there was such a visible one where there hadn't been one in many years, that is what gained media focus. Had this event happened in another stable country, such as Australia, Sweden, Japan or possibly even China, it would be major news, due to the unexpected and unusual instance. We still hear about attacks in Israel, or abuses in Turkey, or bad prison conditions in Greece, but they are not sensationalised by the 'how could this happen' value; instead, depressingly, it is a case of 'what? Again?'.
Depending on whether you know where to look, you can find out about the various injustices of the world, and what people are doing to deal with them. There are human rights abuses in Turkey - we know this, because their are organisations that report them, and those that try to combat them both politically and in the Turkish judicial system. Political pressure is being put on Turkey to end human rights abuses by the EU - if they don't end, they don't join. The same with Romania, where today the Prime Minister is resigning in protest over Romania refusing to do little to counter the accusations of human rights violations in the country. Again, EU pressure is forcing the hands of those who conflict with human rights. Romania has been told that due to this decision not to change the judicial system, Romania will not accede to the Union in 2007. Movements are being made in Africa to deal with abuses, and regular reports are made upon these. Iraqi citizens receive aid from the ICCR.
Regarding Sellafield, yes it is a shocking incident. Yet I also knew about it in February, because it was reported here. And as for no-one making a commotion, this is hardly true. There are demands by the safeguards commission for a full inquiry into the event, and why it went unnoticed. The EU (again I mention the EU, but this is due to their relevance in European politics and news) have used this as further ammunition for their intention to put nuclear power under their control, rather than it being a measure of national concern, so that there is a coherent system of widespread safeguards and accountability for nuclear power facilities, and regular inspections performed by a European body.