Barking Pumpkin
Member
- Aug 31, 2004
- 2,942
- 3
- 36
- 34
No, because I already had the money. It was in my pocket, and you took it from me. Not the same.
Barking Pumpkin said:Even giving you the biggest benefit of the doubt, you're looking at......"depriving someone of money they might have had, not taking money from them." So I think your analogy is faulty.
Barking Pumpkin said:No, because I already had the money. It was in my pocket, and you took it from me. Not the same.
rockyracoon said:BP, do you represent some large consortium of bootleggers that you are this concerned about it? I'm just curious as to why this topic is so important to you.
The Fiddler said:
When a band performs, it's performance is copyrighted. It cannot be taped or recorded without their consent. They own all rights to the performance and the money the performance generates in future sales. So yes, they are entitled to any money generated from the performance even if they don't "own it" yet - they "MADE" the show and own rights. If there was no show, there would be no bootleg to sell.
Barking Pumpkin said:The majority of taping has no profit/spending involved in it.
Barking Pumpkin said:No, because I already had the money. It was in my pocket, and you took it from me. Not the same.
King Lek said:I missed the Angrafan quote...too funny..."bootlegs do not affect a bands finances almost at all".....
Define: "almost at all"
Now, if i take that way from you....have it deducted from your paycheck....Ummm....it that ok?
Sheesh......
Angrafan said:LOL.It doesn't deduct almost ANYTHING from the bands's pay.... BP and some others already defended the point well enough... I will not even waste my time explaining it...
Firehead said:If some of those people went to more than one Metal show a year, then they'd realize that MOST venues DON'T allow ANY PICTURES.